Back

Modeling Site-Specific Mutation Patterns in Pandemic-Scale Phylogenetics

Martin, S.; Ly-Trong, N.; Minh, B. Q.; Goldman, N.; De Maio, N.

2026-05-04 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.30.721865 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Models of genome evolution often account for different evolutionary rates at different genome positions due to, e.g., varying selective pressures or mutation rates. Recent evidence from millions of publicly shared SARS-CoV-2 genomes has revealed a more complex mutational landscape than can be modeled with existing approaches. Here, mutation rates are in fact not only highly position-specific, as currently modeled, but also nucleotide-specific; for example, specific mutations can occur very often at certain determined genome positions, while at the same positions other mutations might not be highly recurrent. Here, we propose and investigate a general model of genome evolution where each genome position is allowed to evolve under an independent, non-normalized substitution rate matrix describing site-specific rates of all mutation types ("Site-Specific Matrix" model, or SSM). We implement SSM in the efficient pandemic-scale phylogenetic inference software CMAPLE. Large-scale genomic epidemiological simulations suggest that, given enough data, SSM can accurately infer position- and nucleotide-specific substitution rates for more frequently observed nucleotides (typically the reference nucleotide), while other rates require higher levels of divergence. Simulations also show that SSM has a modest impact on the accuracy of phylogenetic tree estimation. We use SSM to analyze the evolution of millions of SARS-CoV-2 genomes and observe substantial mismatches between the substitution rates of classical rate variation models and our SSM estimates. These results suggest that classical models of rate variation are inadequate for modeling site-specific mutation patterns and that SSM is a useful alternative for large-scale genome analyses.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.1%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
4
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.8%
5
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.8%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
7
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
12
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
13
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
14
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
15
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
18
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
24
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
27
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%