Back

Time-step restrictions for numerical approximations of the Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) equations

Jaeger, K. H.; Tveito, A.

2026-05-06 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.30.721819 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) system is an accurate model of electrodiffusion of ionic species. It is commonly used in situations where nanoscale resolution is required, for instance close to ion channels in the membranes of biological cells. The inherent stiffness of the equations has made them challenging to solve and has limited the applicability of the system. In particular, the time step required for stable solutions has typically needed to be very short (nanoseconds), which makes simulations on the time scale of an action potential (milliseconds) difficult. Recently, it has been observed that avoiding operator splitting and instead solving the concentration equations and the electrostatic equation in a coupled manner relaxes the time-step limitation considerably. However, no theoretical explanation of this observation has been provided. Here, we aim to explain why the coupled scheme allows much larger time steps. We illustrate the mechanism by considering special cases that define necessary, but not sufficient, conditions for stability. We also show that these conditions remain relevant for the fully coupled PNP model in 3D.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.1%
3
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
5
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
10
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
12
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
15
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
26
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%