Back

Impacts of different types of florivores on flower metabolomes in the field

Gaar, S.; Müller, C.; Dussarrat, T.

2026-05-03 plant biology
10.64898/2026.04.30.721624 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIHerbivory is a major biotic stress for plants, triggering the induction and modulation of diverse specialized metabolites. Such induction responses are well studied for leaves and have been shown to depend on the herbivore feeding mode. Little is known about changes in flower metabolites and chemodiversity due to florivory type. Moreover, we lack an understanding of the intraspecific variation in such responses and whether these are spatially structured. C_LIO_LIThe aromatic plant Tanacetum vulgare, which shows high intraspecific chemodiversity in terpene profiles, was used to examine chemotype-specific metabolic responses of flower heads to infestation by the inflorescence-infesting aphid Macrosiphoniella tanacetaria or the flower-feeding beetle Olibrus spp. under field conditions. At peak flowering, each plant received both florivory treatments on separate stems, leaving one stem herbivore-free as a control. After four days, flower heads were harvested to analyze terpenes (GC-MS) and metabolic fingerprints (LC-MS). C_LIO_LIWe found stem-specific floral metabolic responses, with florivory altering specific chemical families and their chemodiversity. Levels of a few terpenes decreased following infestation, while none increased. Untargeted analyses revealed that aphid infestation had a lower effect on flower chemistry than beetle infestation, with aphid infestation mainly causing decreases and beetle infestation predominantly leading to increases in some metabolite intensities, but little overlap across treatments and chemotypes. C_LIO_LIOur results demonstrate that floral metabolic responses to florivory are spatially structured, florivore type-specific and shaped by plant chemotype. These findings highlight that the interplay between vascular organization, insect feeding mode, and intraspecific chemodiversity governs how flowers adjust their chemical defenses. C_LI One-sentence summaryTanacetum vulgare showed chemotype-specific responses to florivory by aphids (Macrosiphoniella tanacetaria) and beetles (Olibrus spp.), with aphids causing decreased and beetles increased levels of metabolic features within the same plant individuals, with little overlap in significant features across chemotypes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.8%
2
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.9%
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.2%
5
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
6
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
8
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
11
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.3%
13
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
15
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
16
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
17
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
21
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
26
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%