Back

Species and strain diversity in Staphylococcus drive divergent host responses in human skin

Yang, R.; Severn, M.; Aiken, E.; Zhou, W.; Voigt, A.; Walker, G.; Koh, A.; Gong, M.; Thapa, M.; Li, S.; Milstone, L.; Oh, J.

2026-04-30 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.30.720712 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The skin microbiome regulates key skin processes, yet the functional diversity of a dominant genus, Staphylococcus, remains poorly resolved at the strain level for multiple species across its pathogenic and commensal continuum. It is likely that Staphylococcus effects on skin are diverse at these finest taxonomic resolutions, but current skin models lack the physiological relevance and scalability needed to profile this diversity. Using an organotypic 3D human skin model (reconstructed human epidermis, RHE), we profiled skin responses to 187 Staphylococcus strains across seven dominant species. Canonically pathogenic species (e.g., S. aureus) induced broad inflammatory responses, whereas prototypical commensal species (e.g., S. hominis) elicited more nuanced effects on innate immune and skin barrier responses. Strikingly, S. epidermidis displayed pronounced strain-level heterogeneity, with subsets inducing either commensal or pathogen-like responses despite lacking canonical virulence factors, suggesting pleiotropic effects. Comparative genomics, dual-transcriptomics, untargeted metabolomics, and growth phenotyping revealed species- and strain-specific traits underlying these differential effects on RHE, including the presence of select cell surface proteins and differential arginine metabolism. Together, our study provides the first high-throughput, species- and strain-resolved analysis of skin-Staphylococcus interactions, offering mechanistic insights and a platform for microbiome-based strategies to modulate skin inflammation and diseases. One-line summaryHigh-throughput profiling of Staphylococcus in a human skin model shows that species- and strain-level diversity underlies a continuum of host barrier and immune responses.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 13%
12.7%
3
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
10.2%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
6
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.4%
7
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
8
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.8%
9
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
12
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
15
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
18
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
20
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
25
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.5%