Insight and symptoms severity in schizophrenia explained by the flexibility of brain dynamics and pharmacological treatment
Janeva, D.; Breyton, M.; Ranjeva, J. P.; Richieri, R.; Boyer, L.; Guye, M.; LANCON, C.; Blin, O.; Jirsa, V.; Petkoski, S.; GUILHAUMOU, R.
Show abstract
Schizophrenias substantial heterogeneity poses a major challenge for understanding its neurobiological mechanisms and predicting treatment response. Moving toward precision psychiatry, we identified clinically meaningful subtypes and characterised their neural and pharmacological profiles. Clustering of multidimensional clinical feature space revealed two distinct patient subtypes, primarily differentiated by degree of illness insight. In parallel, three symptom-severity groups defined by positive and negative psychopathology dimensions provided a complementary stratification framework. Resting-state fMRI analyses revealed that higher-insight patients exhibited greater dynamic reconfiguration of regional functional connectivity, emerging as the primary neuroimaging feature differentiating subtypes. Multivariate classification and feature importance analysis confirmed the discriminative value of neuroimaging metrics. Across both subtyping approaches, regional flexibility was spatially associated with cortical receptor density maps in a subtype-specific manner, particularly for D2 and 5-HT2A when accounting for estimated antipsychotic receptor occupancies. Additionally, pharmacological-clinical associations were stronger and more spatially widespread in specific subtypes, indicating subtype-dependent pharmacodynamic relationships. Furthermore, structural equation modelling demonstrated that neuroimaging measures mediate receptor pharmacologys influence on clinical outcomes. These findings together show that integrating clinical, neuroimaging, and pharmacological data can uncover biologically grounded schizophrenia subtypes, identify functional biomarkers, and inform personalised therapeutic strategies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Auditory and Visual Thalamocortical Connectivity Alterations in Unmedicated People with Schizophrenia: An Individualized Sensory Thalamic Localization and Resting-State Functional Connectivity Study 95%
- Aberrant hierarchical prediction errors are associated with transition to psychosis: A computational single-trial analysis of the mismatch negativity 94%
- Functional MRI connectivity accurately distinguishes cases with psychotic disorders from healthy controls, based on cortical features associated with neurodevelopment 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychotic-like experiences, polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and structural properties of the salience, default mode and central-executive networks in healthy participants from UK Biobank 95%
- Molecular, physiological and functional features underlying cortical thinning related to antipsychotic medication use 95%
- Frequency-specific changes in prefrontal activity associated with maladaptive belief updating in volatile environments in euthymic bipolar disorder 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connectivity patterns of task-specific brain networks allow individual prediction of cognitive symptom dimension of schizophrenia and link to molecular architecture 97%
- Spatial patterning of tissue volume loss in schizophrenia reflects brain network architecture 96%
- Multivariate Resting-State Functional Connectivity Features Linked to Transdiagnostic Psychopathology in Early Psychosis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frontal lobe fALFF measured from resting-state fMRI at baseline predicts acute treatment response in first episode psychosis 95%
- Connectome-based predictive modeling of early and chronic psychosis symptoms 94%
- Effects of Diazepam on Hippocampal Blood Flow in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.