Back

Insight and symptoms severity in schizophrenia explained by the flexibility of brain dynamics and pharmacological treatment

Janeva, D.; Breyton, M.; Ranjeva, J. P.; Richieri, R.; Boyer, L.; Guye, M.; LANCON, C.; Blin, O.; Jirsa, V.; Petkoski, S.; GUILHAUMOU, R.

2026-05-01 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.30.26352132 medRxiv
Show abstract

Schizophrenias substantial heterogeneity poses a major challenge for understanding its neurobiological mechanisms and predicting treatment response. Moving toward precision psychiatry, we identified clinically meaningful subtypes and characterised their neural and pharmacological profiles. Clustering of multidimensional clinical feature space revealed two distinct patient subtypes, primarily differentiated by degree of illness insight. In parallel, three symptom-severity groups defined by positive and negative psychopathology dimensions provided a complementary stratification framework. Resting-state fMRI analyses revealed that higher-insight patients exhibited greater dynamic reconfiguration of regional functional connectivity, emerging as the primary neuroimaging feature differentiating subtypes. Multivariate classification and feature importance analysis confirmed the discriminative value of neuroimaging metrics. Across both subtyping approaches, regional flexibility was spatially associated with cortical receptor density maps in a subtype-specific manner, particularly for D2 and 5-HT2A when accounting for estimated antipsychotic receptor occupancies. Additionally, pharmacological-clinical associations were stronger and more spatially widespread in specific subtypes, indicating subtype-dependent pharmacodynamic relationships. Furthermore, structural equation modelling demonstrated that neuroimaging measures mediate receptor pharmacologys influence on clinical outcomes. These findings together show that integrating clinical, neuroimaging, and pharmacological data can uncover biologically grounded schizophrenia subtypes, identify functional biomarkers, and inform personalised therapeutic strategies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 10%
14.5%
2
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.0%
4
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
5
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.8%
7
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
8
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
9
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
10
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
12
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.0%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
15
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
18
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
20
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
22
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%