Back

In vitro comparison of Aβ-targeting SNIPR, synNotch, and TRUCK for cell-based drug delivery in Alzheimer's disease.

Siebrand, C. J.; Mayeri, Z.; Brown, I.; Andersen, J. K.; Walton, C. C.

2026-05-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.29.721717 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pioneering research is adapting chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) from oncology to Alzheimers disease (AD) by targeting amyloid beta (A{beta}). Newer synthetic receptor systems can go beyond, transforming cells into targeted biological drug factories that can couple A{beta} detection to synthesis and secretion of genetically encoded therapeutics. Among candidate systems, T cells Redirected for Universal Cytokine Killing (TRUCK), synthetic Notch (synNotch), and Synthetic Intramembrane Proteolysis Receptors (SNIPR) have shown promise in oncology. Here, we adapt these platforms to AD using a shared A{beta}-targeting binding domain derived from Aducanumab (Aduhelm), coupled to inducible expression cassettes driving identical transgenes: secreted Metridia luciferase (MetLuc) and a Lecanemab (Leqembi)-based chimeric human-mouse antibody (chLecanemab). To validate these systems in vitro, Jurkat clones expressing each receptor were treated with oligomer-enriched A{beta} (A{beta}O) to model AD, and receptor output was quantified by media MetLuc levels and chLecanemab colocalization with A{beta} aggregates. For TRUCK systems, we show the A{beta}-targeting CAR successfully activated Jurkat cells by flow cytometry. We also show that six Nuclear Factor of Activated T-cells (NFAT) tandem repeat response elements (6xNFAT) paired with either minimal interleukin-2, synthetic TATA box, or minimal cytomegalovirus promoters resulted in functional regulatory regions. Despite this, all TRUCK variants failed to significantly upregulate MetLuc in response to A{beta}O. In contrast, both synNotch and SNIPR responded robustly to A{beta}O, with SNIPR outperforming synNotch in both MetLuc and chLecanemab production. These findings establish SNIPR and synNotch as promising platforms for future research on cell-based targeted therapeutic delivery in AD.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
3
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
5
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
6
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
9
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
11
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
50% of probability mass above
13
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.7%
16
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
20
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.1%
22
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
27
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Molecular Neurodegeneration
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
29
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
30
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%