Back

A flexible cross-correlation based population model of interaural time difference coding in barn owl's midbrain

Fischer, B. J.; Syeda, R. F.; Pena, J. L.

2026-05-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.29.721697 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The cross-correlation model has long served as the standard computational framework for describing interaural time difference (ITD) processing in the barn owls auditory system. While successful in explaining initial sinusoidal responses at the site of coincidence detection in the nucleus laminaris, this previous standard model fails to capture the full diversity of ITD tuning observed in the inferior colliculus (IC), where neurons exhibit sharper-than-sinusoidal ITD tuning, nonlinear frequency integration, level-dependent gain control, and interaural level difference (ILD)-dependent modulation of ITD selectivity. Here we present a modified cross-correlation model that addresses these limitations through the addition of parameterized gain control, linear filters with inhibitory surround structure, static nonlinearities, and ILD-dependent modulation of the cross-correlation computation. We show that divisive gain control produces realistic rate-level functions, including non-monotonic responses. Furthermore, inhibitory weights in the linear filter, combined with a threshold or expansive nonlinearity, generate sharper-than-sinusoidal ITD tuning consistent with experimental observations. This model reproduces both linear and nonlinear two-tone frequency integration and demonstrates that independent variation of filter bandwidth and nonlinearity shape accounts for the experimentally observed lack of correlation between side-peak suppression and frequency tuning width across the neuronal population. In addition, ILD-dependent modifications to the model produce shifts in best ITD and reductions in ITD tuning strength, as observed in the lateral shell of the central nucleus of the IC. The model parameters can be efficiently determined using simulation-based inference, enabling generation of realistic neuronal populations. Thus, this flexible, analytically tractable framework provides a foundation for investigating population coding of auditory space in the owls midbrain.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.1%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
3
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
4
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.6%
9
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
12
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
15
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
18
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
19
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
23
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
25
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
27
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%