Back

A Comprehensive Mathematical Model of Avidity in Cytokine Signaling

Douglass, E. F.; Bastian, W.; Mochel, J. P.

2026-05-04 systems biology
10.64898/2026.04.29.721617 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multivalent ligand-receptor interactions underlie most forms of cell-cell communication, yet a general quantitative framework for "avidity" has remained elusive for over a century. Here, we derive closed-form expressions for signaling potency (EC50) in multivalent systems directly from first principles, extending exact analytical models of ternary complex equilibria to account for receptor confinement at cell surfaces. These equations unify antibody-antigen and cytokine-receptor interactions under a common mathematical framework in which potency emerges as a function of binding constants and receptor density. In contrast to monovalent models, EC50 is no longer equal to the dissociation constant (Kd), but instead reflects receptor-dependent avidity effects that vary across cellular contexts. We validate these predictions across biophysical measurements, in vitro binding and signaling assays, in vivo murine cytokine perturbation data, and human spatial transcriptomic datasets. The framework explains longstanding empirical observations, including enhanced antibody potency through avidity and asymmetric control of cytokine signaling by receptor subunits. By embedding these equations within a regression-compatible formulation, we enable inference of signaling drivers from single-cell and spatial transcriptomic data. This work establishes a mechanistic bridge between molecular binding, receptor context, and tissue-level signaling, providing a quantitative foundation for interpreting and modeling intercellular communication in health and disease.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
23.1%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
19.9%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 11%
4.4%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
8
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
10
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
16
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
19
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
20
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
22
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
24
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%