Back

Extraction-dependent bone proteomics reveals distinct stable and dynamic protein modules during early post-exposure degradation

Najar, M. A.; Choudhary, N.; Abdulsalam, S.; Sajeevan, A.; Ahmad, M. N.

2026-05-04 systems biology
10.64898/2026.04.29.721604 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bone is a highly durable biological tissue widely used in forensic, archaeological, and anthropological investigations; however, efficient protein recovery and understanding of protein stability over time remain major challenges in skeletal proteomics. Here, we systematically evaluated three bone protein extraction workflows and integrated them with data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry to assess proteome coverage, reproducibility, and temporal protein dynamics under environmentally exposed conditions. Comparative analysis demonstrated that extraction strategy is a primary determinant of detectable proteome composition. EDTA-based demineralization followed by SDS extraction provided the deepest proteome coverage and highest reproducibility, whereas guanidine hydrochloride extraction preferentially enriched collagen and extracellular matrix proteins. In contrast, acid-based extraction yielded limited protein recovery. Temporal profiling of bone samples collected at 10 and 45 days post-exposure revealed two distinct protein classes. A temporally stable module, enriched in collagens and extracellular matrix proteins including COL1A2, COL5A2, BGN, SPARCL1, and NID2, exhibited minimal abundance change, indicating resistance to environmental degradation. In contrast, temporally dynamic proteins, enriched in mitochondrial, metabolic, and intracellular pathways such as ACO2, OGDH, PDHA1, ATP5PO, and PFKM, showed marked decline over time. These findings support a two-compartment model of bone protein preservation in which matrix-embedded proteins are preferentially retained while exposed intracellular proteins undergo progressive degradation. Collectively, this study establishes an integrated framework linking extraction methodology with temporal proteome stability and identifies candidate markers for skeletal preservation assessment and temporal biomarker development in forensic and archaeological applications.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
3
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
4
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
7
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
9
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.9%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
21
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
23
Molecular Omics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
28
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%