Back

β-lactam antibiotics trigger TLR2-dependent Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction in leptospirosis: bacteriostatic antibiotics offer a safer alternative

Papadopoulos, S.; Bernard, T.; Joffres, D.; Vernel-Pauillac, F.; Cagliero, J.; COSIPOP Study group, ; Werts, C.

2026-05-02 immunology
10.64898/2026.04.29.721589 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Leptospirosis is a reemerging neglected zoonotic disease causing 1 million cases and 60,000 deaths annually. Antibiotic treatment can trigger a detrimental inflammatory Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction (JHR). We investigated the effects and mechanisms of different antibiotics and consequences of JHR in leptospirosis. In a mouse model of severe infection and in healthy human whole-blood infected with bioluminescent Leptospira interrogans, we compared bactericidal {beta}-lactams (amoxicillin, ceftriaxone) with bacteriostatic agents (azithromycin, doxycycline). We assessed bacterial survival, cytokine levels, pathophysiology, and JHR mechanism using neutralizing antibodies and Toll-like receptor (TLR) knockout mice. {beta}-lactams induced profound pro-inflammatory cytokine release whereas bacteriostatic antibiotics did not, despite effective killing. Progressive {beta}-lactam dosing and corticosteroids mitigated inflammation. In humans, this inflammation was largely dependent on TLR2 (the lipoprotein receptor) and TLR5 (the flagellin receptor). In mice, amoxicillin exacerbated disease severity within hours, notably worsening myocarditis. Only the stealthy virulent clinical isolates of Leptospira interrogans induced JHR, which was also observed with Borrelia burgdorferi. These findings demonstrate that {beta}-lactam-induced JHR is driven by TLR recognition of released spirochaetal components, worsening outcomes, evoking a cytokine storm. They challenge the World Health Organizations recommendations favouring {beta}-lactams as first-line therapy, advocating instead for bacteriostatic antibiotics to prevent JHR and improve patient outcomes worldwide.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
14.5%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.9%
3
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
4
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.2%
6
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.5%
9
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.0%
11
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
12
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
13
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
14
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.9%
16
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
19
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
21
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%