Back

SpatialBench: Comparative cross-platform benchmarking of high-resolution spatial transcriptomics using matched mouse lymphoid tissue

Solano, A. N.; Yip, R. K. H.; Wang, C.; Amann-Zalcenstein, D.; Rajasekhar, P.; Zaman, I.; Motyer, A.; Cmero, M.; Xu, Y.; Pan, Y.; Anttila, C. J. A.; Studniberg, S. I.; Hickey, P. F.; Wang, L.; Sargeant, C. J.; Ling, L.; Chen, Y.; Mishi, R. D.; Ioannidis, L. J.; Good-Jacobson, K. L.; King, H. W.; Rogers, K. L.; Hansen, D. S.; Bowden, R.; Ritchie, M. E.

2026-05-01 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.29.721531 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) has rapidly expanded with the introduction of multiple high-resolution platforms, yet cross-platform benchmarking remains limited and largely focused on technical performance. Here we present SpatialBench, a matched multi-platform resource comprising Visium HD, Xenium and MERSCOPE data together with single-cell and single-nucleus references from a malaria-challenged wild-type and B cell-specific Tbx21 knockout mouse spleen model. In this system, loss of T-bet in B cells disrupts germinal center (GC) polarization and antibody maturation, providing a biologically grounded benchmark for technology comparison. We leveraged this system to systematically evaluate ST platform performance using technical and biological readouts. Across platforms, immune organization and Tbx21-associated programs were consistently recovered, indicating robustness of major biological signals. Platforms instead differed in the level of biological resolution accessible. Visium HD enabled transcriptome-scale GC characterization and, together with Xenium, resolved dark and light zone organization, whereas GC zonation was not resolved in MERSCOPE, consistent with differences in transcript detection sensitivity. SpatialBench provides a biologically defined reference dataset for evaluation of ST technologies, method development, computational benchmarking, and studies of GC spatial organization in lymphoid tissue.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.