Back

Effects of a social network modification of a community-based family planning intervention on contraceptive use among adolescent wives in Niger: a cluster randomized controlled trial

Baker, H.; Tomar, S.; Hachimou, A.; Boubacar Moussa, K.; Gayles, J.; Lundgren, R.

2026-05-01 sexual and reproductive health
10.64898/2026.04.29.26352112 medRxiv
Show abstract

Niger has the worlds highest adolescent fertility rate. Social network (SN) approaches to family planning may improve intervention impact through diffusion beyond direct beneficiaries. We tested a social network modification of a community-based family planning intervention to increase contraceptive use compared to standard implementation and control.Three-arm cluster-randomized trial in 56 rural villages in Maradi, Niger. Eligible participants were adolescent wives (AW) aged 15-19 with 0-1 children and their husbands. Villages were randomized using covariate-constrained randomization (Minirand): standard Kulawa (100% coverage), SN modification (50% coverage pairing AW-mother-in-law dyads with adopt-a-friend diffusion), or control. Interventions were delivered over 12 months. Blinding of participants and implementers was infeasible; analysts were blinded. Primary outcome was current contraceptive use assessed at endline and analyzed using intention-to-treat difference-in-differences logistic regression adjusting for clustering; no missing data were imputed. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05777473; trial closed to enrollment.From May 1 to September 30, 2022, 1,538 female AW were enrolled (517 control, 532 Kulawa, 489 Kulawa SN); 1,396 (90.8%) completed endline (May-August 2024). Compared to control, the SN arm significantly increased contraceptive use (AOR 2.36, 95% CI 1.27-4.44); the standard arm showed no significant effect (AOR 1.36, 95% CI 0.76-2.41). Within SN villages, both non-participants (AOR 2.66, 95% CI 1.25-5.70) and direct participants (AOR 2.10, 95% CI 0.99-4.44) showed increased use versus control, demonstrating behavioral diffusion. No intervention-related adverse events were observed in any arm. An SN approach targeting AWs, husbands, mothers-in-law, and adopted friends achieved greater effects than standard implementation despite 50% lower coverage, with evidence of diffusion to non-participants. Leveraging social networks may improve impact of family planning programs in high-fertility settings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.9%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
6
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
11
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
14
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
25
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%