Back

Dark adaptation of cone photoreceptor responses is revealed by optoretinography

Cai, Y.; Zhang, A.; Bartuzel, M. M.; Maddipatla, R.; Zawadzki, R. J.; Jonnal, R. S.

2026-05-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.28.721480 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dark adaptation is the essential process that restores visual sensitivity following exposure to bright light, yet the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Here, we propose a method for assessing dark adaptation in cones using optoretinography (ORG) based on adaptive optics optical coherence tomography (AO-OCT). ORG quantifies cone functional response by monitoring nano-scale changes in the cones outer segment occurring over hundreds of milliseconds after visible stimulation. This method consists of sequential measurements of stimulus-evoked cone responses over the course of minutes of dark adaptation. Each response captures optical path length changes in single photoreceptor outer segments over milliseconds during a multi-minute recovery period following a strong photopigment bleach. We parameterized cone ORG responses and proposed an exponential model linking ORG dynamics to pigment regeneration. Parameters of the ORG response exhibited exponential decay behavior during dark adaptation, and were thus fit with exponential functions and quantified by the resulting decay parameter{tau} . Parameters capturing the amplitude of the ORG responses recovered more slowly than those capturing temporal dynamics of the responses. This difference is consistent with distinct contributions from photopigment regeneration and downstream phototransduction processes. Recovery speed varied by two-to threefold among three normal subjects, suggesting substantial inter-subject physiological diversity. Processes within the cone, including pigment regeneration, are thought to underlie the gains in photopic visual sensitivity that occur in the dark. These findings highlight ORG as an objective and sensitive assay of those cellular mechanisms. While the ORG itself has shown promise as a biomarker of the health of the photoreceptor response to light, the results of this study show that it may also be useful for probing the health of the intra- and intercellular homeostatic mechanisms that support it.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
4
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
5
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.5%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
8
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
10
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.4%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.4%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
17
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
22
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
23
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
25
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
26
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%