EnzCast: Prediction of Patient-Specific Enzymatic Kinetics through Multi-Modal Deep Learning and Isoform-Resolved Bayesian Inference based on Single-Cell Transcriptomics
Mu, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Z.; Luo, B.; Huang, Z.; Lin, X.; Xu, L.; Li, X.; Qu, Y.; Xiao, J.; Wang, Z.; Shi, B.; Ou, Q.; Yao, B.; Yan, J.; Zhuang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, R.; Xu, Y.
Show abstract
Enzyme kinetic parameters underpin mechanistic biology but remain sparse in physiological context. We present EnzCast, a multi-modal framework jointly predicting Km, kcat, kcat/Km, and Ki from protein sequence, 3D structure, substrate chemistry, and experimental conditions, paired with IsoKin, an isoform-resolved Bayesian framework converting EnzCast priors into patient-specific in vivo kinetics. Trained on KinBench, the largest curated kinetics database, task-adaptive EnzCast achieved R2 = 0.413, 0.455, 0.227, and 0.105 for Km, Ki, kcat, and kcat/Km, surpassing all baselines on catalytic tasks. Systematic condition scans recovered compartment-specific pH direction inversion and pathway-level temperature responses. In a 20-patient colorectal cancer single-cell cohort, IsoKin reduced posterior uncertainty by 73.3% and 77.3%, revealing cell-type-specific rewiring. Orthogonal validation--scFEA flux, DepMap essentiality (permutation P = 0.0008) and TCGA survival-- provided mixed but directionally consistent support. Together, EnzCast and IsoKin bridge in vitro prediction, condition-aware biochemical interrogation and patient-resolved in vivo inference.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-omics integration and regulatory inference for unpaired single-cell data with a graph-linked unified embedding framework 95%
- Comparative analysis of cell-cell communication at single-cell resolution 95%
- Multi-resolution deconvolution of spatial transcriptomics data reveals continuous patterns of inflammation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.