Back

Effects of bimodal divided attention on cortical representations of linguistic context during continuous speech perception in noise

Xie, Z.

2026-05-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.28.721419 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Speech perception often takes place in environments with competing sensory inputs, both within the auditory modality and across modalities; for example, following a conversation in a noisy cafe while simultaneously reading a menu. This study examined the extent to which dividing attention between auditory and visual modalities (bimodal divided attention) influences linguistic context processing across hierarchical levels during continuous speech perception in noise. Electroencephalographic (EEG) responses were recorded while participants listened to audiobook stories in multitalker babble as a secondary task, concurrently performing a demanding primary visual task that imposed either low or high cognitive load. Behaviorally, speech comprehension accuracy was significantly lower under high-load than low-load dual-task conditions. Multivariate temporal response function (mTRF) encoding models were used to predict EEG responses from information-theoretic measures (entropy and surprisal) indexing linguistic context at sublexical, word-form, and sentence levels. Significant neutral tracking was observed at the word-form and sentence levels, but not the sublexical level. Critically, neutral tracking of sentence-level linguistic representations was significantly reduced under high compared to low load, with effects emerging at latencies beyond 200 ms. In contrast, neutral tracking of word-form-level representations was unaffected by dual-task load. mTRF analyses further revealed that neutral tracking of acoustic features was not modulated by dual-task load. These findings indicate that bimodal divided attention selectively disrupts cortical representations of sentence-level linguistic context, while lower-level processing remains relatively preserved. Such impairments in higher-level linguistic processing may contribute to reduced speech comprehension during multitasking in noisy environments.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
21.8%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
3
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
8
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.6%
12
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
14
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
15
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
18
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
21
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
23
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Current Research in Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
27
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
30
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%