Back

Superposition eyes of diurnal and nocturnal hawkmoths are imperfect spheres and lack acute zones.

Sondhi, Y.; Qian, R.; Currea, J. P.; Koushiar, I.; Degen, J.; Glass, D.; Stanley, E.; Sponberg, S.; Kitching, I. J.; Kawahara, A. Y.; Theobald, J. C.

2026-04-30 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.04.28.721382 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Superposition compound eyes improve sensitivity by pooling light from multiple facets and are widespread among nocturnal insects, including moths and beetles. Optical theory predicts that superposition eyes must be nearly spherical to form coherent images and therefore lack highly pronounced acute zones with high spatial resolution. To examine this, we imaged eyes of six hawkmoths (Sphingidae) spanning diurnal and nocturnal activity with high-resolution microcomputed tomography. Our automated pipeline created detailed eye maps quantifying morphological parameters. We measured local eye curvature (radial distance), interommatidial angle ({Delta}{varphi}), facet size and crystalline cone skewness (tilt of cone axes relative to the local surface normal). All species show more curvature in the dorso-ventral plane with flattening in the antero-posterior plane. However, their eyes still retain near-spherical curvature globally, with diurnal species showing greater distortion. For facet parameters, spatial acuity is generally highest (lowest {Delta}{varphi}) near the eye center and decreases gradually toward the periphery. However, overall variation in spatial acuity is low and these eyes lack distinct acute zones. Facet size gradually changes from center to periphery, increasing in some species and decreasing in the others. Cone skewness is present in all six species (0{degrees}-10{degrees}), but in two diurnal species of hummingbird hawkmoths it increases markedly in the posterior region (15{degrees}-30{degrees}) possibly compensating for regional eye flatness. This paper provides foundational data of ommatidial and eye shape measurements and advances our assumptions about how superposition eyes function.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.5%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.1%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.4%
5
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.7%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
20
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%