Back

Resilience to persistent pain is characterized by stable periodic and increased aperiodic cortical activity

Zamorano, A. M.; Chen, C.; Millard, S. K.; Kleber, B.; Vuust, P.; Flor, H.; Graven-Nielsen, T.

2026-04-30 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.28.721303 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Individual variability in pain perception raises fundamental questions about how biological and experiential factors shape pain processing. Cognitive-demanding motor training is a key driver of use-dependent brain plasticity and may contribute to differences in pain responses. Using musicians as a model of cognitive-motor expertise, we examined how such experience influences cortical dynamics and pain perception during experimentally induced prolonged musculoskeletal pain. Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded in musicians and non-musicians before (Day 1) and during pain development (Days 3 and 8) following intramuscular nerve growth factor (NGF) administration. We parameterized periodic (alpha peak frequency, power, frontal asymmetry) and aperiodic (exponent, offset) components of the EEG signal to characterize intrinsic cortical activity. During pain development, non-musicians exhibited slowing of peak alpha frequency, a neural marker associated with ongoing pain. In contrast, musicians showed preserved alpha dynamics and greater left frontal asymmetry, reflecting resilient top-down pain regulation. Musicians also displayed higher aperiodic exponent across sessions, suggesting that musical training shapes the excitation-to-inhibition (E:I) balance potentially reflecting a shift toward greater inhibitory activity. Notably, across all participants, only aperiodic features improved the prediction of pain severity, with higher exponents and higher offsets associated with lower pain ratings. These findings demonstrate that cognitive-motor training shapes cortical dynamics during sustained pain, supporting more stable, resilient cortical responses to pain. Such training also contributes to inter-individual variability in pain processing. Moreover, this study identifies aperiodic EEG components as predictors of pain severity and resilience.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.6%
2
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
6
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.9%
8
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
9
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
10
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.9%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
14
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
16
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
18
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
24
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%