Back

High throughput single-cell RNA sequencing of intact adult cardiomyocytes and non-myocytes using a split-pool approach

Hu, Y.; Gurung, R.; Mueller, S.; Villanueva, E.; Stenzig, J.; Rayan, N.; Luu, T. D. A.; Nur, S.; Tan, B.; Liu, B.; Yu, H.; Choi, H.; Foo, R.; Ackers-Johnson, M. A.

2026-04-30 cell biology
10.64898/2026.04.28.721288 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MOTIVATIONAdult cardiomyocytes are difficult to profile by whole-cell single-cell RNA sequencing because of their large size and fragility, which make them poorly compatible with standard workflows. Current approaches for adult cardiomyocyte transcriptomics often require a trade-off between data quality and throughput, thus, studies instead rely heavily on sequencing of nuclei alone. Therefore, we set out to develop a high-quality and scalable workflow for adult heart cells using in-cell ligation and split-pool barcoding strategies to address this methodological gap. This workflow may be further generalisable to other large cell types or samples containing cell populations with highly unequal RNA content. SUMMARYAdult cardiomyocytes are difficult to profile by whole-cell single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Here, we developed a high-quality and scalable workflow for adult heart cells using in-cell ligation and split-pool barcoding. We identified per-cell RNA content as a significant variable that must be accounted for. Separation of cardiomyocytes (large cells) and non-cardiomyocytes (small cells) before library construction, and allocation of deeper sequencing to cardiomyocytes, produced high-quality whole-cell datasets for both compartments. Compared with single-nucleus RNA sequencing, whole-cell cardiomyocyte profiling better recovered metabolic, mitochondrial, cytoplasmic translational, and contractile gene programs. This workflow provides a practical method for scalable, high-quality cardiomyocyte whole-cell scRNA-seq and offers general strategies for other large cell types or samples containing cell populations with highly unequal RNA content.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.8%
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.8%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
5
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
7
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.2%
10
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
12
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
14
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
15
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
19
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
25
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
26
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
29
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%