Back

Automatic deep learning-based segmentation and quantification of stented arterial cross-sections for morphometric analysis

Kraftberger, M.; Spirgath, K.; Haase, T.; Bandelin, R.; Meyer, T.; Jaitner, N.; Tzschätzsch, H.

2026-04-30 pathology
10.64898/2026.04.28.721259 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Arterial vascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis, are among the most serious global health threats. In preclinical studies, morphometric analysis of histological arterial cross-sections is considered the gold standard for assessing vascular remodeling and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. However, morphometric analysis is usually performed manually, which is time-consuming, subjective, and requires significant user interaction. This paper presents a fully automated, operator-independent framework for the precise morphometric analysis of stented arterial cross-sections, extending the previously developed qHisto (quantitative histology) framework for the quantification of various histological components. A neural network for the segmentation of arterial structures was trained and evaluated using 819 cross-sections. In addition, a quantitative analysis of vascular morphology, fibrin area, and lumen asymmetry was performed using 72 cross-sections from coated and uncoated balloons. The model achieved high segmentation accuracy with a median Dice similarity coefficient of 0.892-0.996. Compared to manual evaluation, the system reduces analysis time by 90%, enabling efficient processing of large datasets. Furthermore, morphometric analysis with qHisto showed significant differences between coated and uncoated balloons, e.g. regarding lumen area (AUC = 0.86) and fibrin ratio (AUC = 0.94). Our developed framework enables fully automated, comprehensive and standardized analysis of histological arterial cross-sections. This helps to reduce time-consuming, repetitive manual assessments and thus facilitates research of disease mechanisms and treatment effects in preclinical studies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
5
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
7
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
12
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
21
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
24
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
28
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%