Back

DIANNE: Segmentation-Free Localization of Histology Differential Attributes

Domanskyi, S.; Rubinstein, J. C.; Sheridan, T. B.; Thiesen, A.; Noorbakhsh, J.; Alcoforado Diniz, J.; Ramasamy, R.; Baker, D. S.; Sheldon, R.; Wu, Q.; Kuchel, G.; Robson, P.; Chuang, J. H.

2026-05-01 pathology
10.64898/2026.04.28.721103 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pathologist-guided distinctions within histology and spatial omic images provide insights into health and disease, with digital pathology leveraging artificial intelligence to automate such assessments. To train computational models, current digital pathology methods rely on upfront manual annotations, which are time-consuming to generate. Pre-annotation is poorly suited to investigating novel spatial behaviors--a major need driven by advances in spatial profiling--for which annotation criteria and data needs will be uncertain. To address these challenges, we present DIANNE, a digital pathology approach for rapid training and inference of spatial differential attributes based on train-time Positive Class Mixup Augmentation. DIANNE can compute foundation model-derived segmentation-free localization of differential classifiers across whole slide H&E images within seconds on a workstation, enabling interactive investigation of spatial niches. Predictive models can be re-trained in real-time in response to patch or regional annotation changes, clarifying determinative biological attributes across slides from only a few dozen annotated patches. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DIANNE for tumor detection, artifact identification, and exploration of pancreatic, fetal membranes and kidney tissue structures. DIANNE also provides analogous capabilities for IHC, multiplex immunofluorescence, and registered spatial transcriptomic+H&E images. DIANNE is implemented in a Jupyter toolkit, enabling rapid development of high-resolution classifiers from weakly-supervised training. DIANNE provides a practical system to quantitatively understand known and novel spatial phenotypes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.4%
4
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
7
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.8%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
14
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
15
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
17
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
18
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
19
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%