Back

A functional investigation of antibody Fc-FcRn variant binding guided by *in silico* free energy perturbation methods

Sampson, J. M.; Sergeeva, A. P.; Gao, T.; Kwon, Y. D.; Reddem, E.; Bahna, F. A.; Mannepalli, S. M.; Zhang, B.; Kwong, P. D.; Shapiro, L.; Honig, B.; Friesner, R. A.

2026-04-30 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.28.721095 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate calculation of energy changes upon mutation is a key requirement for the effective use of computational methods in protein design. In this study, we applied free energy perturbation (FEP) calculations to predict the effects of mutations on the binding free energy between the immunoglobulin subtype G (IgG) antibody fragment-crystallizable (Fc) region and the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), an interaction that is primarily responsible for antibody half-life. We assembled an extensive experimental dataset of Fc-FcRn binding affinities for wild-type (wt) and mutant complexes, including values from literature and from newly measured results. Starting from a crystal structure of the M252Y/S254T/T256E ("YTE") Fc variant bound to FcRn, we prepared all-atom models of human IgG1-subtype wt and YTE variant Fc-FcRn complexes, adding explicit hydrogens and assigning protonation states for key ionizable residues. Initial results using standard FEP protocols to compute relative binding free energies were promising but exhibited multiple outliers. By accounting for coupling effects for FEP mutations near key histidine residues, we improved the results for several outliers, suggesting such coupling as an important approach for pH-sensitive systems. Further, upon determining new crystal structures of four Fc variants at multiple pH values, we observed subtle conformational changes in unbound Fc; by accounting for these conformational changes in FEP calculations, we additionally improved agreement with experiment. The detailed structural and energetic analyses of the Fc-FcRn system we present here thus provide an accurate energy-calculation framework to enable rational in silico design of novel Fc variants. SignificanceThe ability to determine changes in binding affinity upon mutation is critical to structure-based protein design. In this study, we demonstrate a successful computational approach using free energy perturbation (FEP) calculations on the antibody Fc-FcRn complex, a medically relevant system with implications for both therapeutic and prophylactic antibody use. Our successful calculation of accurate binding energies across a wide range of cases speaks to the power of the FEP methodology in navigating the free energy landscapes of dynamic molecular complexes. Furthermore, we show that accurate Fc-FcRn affinity calculations required careful consideration of conformational flexibility between bound and unbound states, contributing to our functional understanding of a system that will be important for future rational antibody-design efforts. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=75 SRC="FIGDIR/small/721095v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (26K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f754d8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e366beorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6e67caorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@602a14_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.0%
4
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.1%
7
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.8%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
12
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.2%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
15
Journal of Computational Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
19
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%