Back

ZonationR: An R interface to the Zonation software for reproducible spatial conservation prioritisation workflows

Cavalcante, T.; Ribeiro, B.; Guidoni-Martins, K.; Kujala, H.

2026-04-30 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.28.720523 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Systematic conservation planning provides a science-based framework for defining conservation goals and supporting transparent spatial decision-making under limited resources. Within this framework, spatial conservation prioritisation tools are widely used to identify areas of high biodiversity value by integrating information on species distributions, connectivity, costs, and other factors into spatially explicit recommendations. Zonation is one of the leading software tools in this field, producing hierarchical priority rankings of landscapes based on conservation value. However, its standard workflow typically relies on manual steps for data preparation, execution, and post-processing, which can become inefficient and difficult to reproduce when multiple scenarios are analysed, limiting accessibility and broader uptake. We introduce ZonationR, an R package that provides a streamlined interface to the Zonation software, enabling fully reproducible and automated spatial prioritisation workflows. The package integrates the entire analysis pipeline, encompassing input preparation, execution of Zonation, and post-processing, while supporting both single-variant and multi-variant workflows. ZonationR also provides tools to explore and interpret outputs, including priority maps, feature performance curves, cost summaries, feature representation metrics, and similarity assessments between prioritisation solutions. By linking directly to the original Zonation engine, the package enables users to benefit from ongoing methodological developments in Zonation and access its functionality through a transparent, script-based workflow, thereby reducing technical barriers to running and understanding spatial prioritisation analyses. Beyond these advantages, its integration within the R environment supports iterative testing of conservation scenarios and more rigorous assessment of methodological decisions, while facilitating seamless connections with wider ecological workflows (e.g., species distribution modelling). As conservation planning increasingly relies on large, complex, multi-source datasets and integrative approaches, such integration is essential for enabling robust, transparent, and reproducible decision-making across spatial scales.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
26.2%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.5%
4
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
8
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
11
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
13
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
19
Journal of Open Source Software
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
24
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
26
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%