Back

Respirometry dataset for oxygen consumption measurements in carabid beetles

Remmers, S.; Dausmann, K. H.

2026-04-30 physiology
10.64898/2026.04.28.720111 bioRxiv
Show abstract

OverviewThis dataset originates from a preliminary respirometry study on carabid beetles from the Elbe Estuary (Northern Germany), encompassing species from freshwater and saltmarsh habitats along a salinity gradient. The study was designed to establish and validate a workflow for measuring oxygen consumption, including chamber setup, sensor recording, drift correction, and calculation of absolute and mass-specific metabolic rates. Oxygen consumption was measured for five species (Carabus auratus, Carabus granulatus, Limodromus assimilis, Poecilus versicolor and Pterostichus niger) using sealed glass vials connected to an optical oxygen system. The dataset provides individual-level measurements and serves primarily as a methodological reference for future respirometry studies on ground-dwelling arthropods. The O2 consumption rates of carabid beetles showed interspecific differences and followed metabolic scaling theory, revealing an inverse relationship between body mass and mass-specific metabolic rates across species (Figure 3). O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=127 SRC="FIGDIR/small/720111v1_fig3.gif" ALT="Figure 3"> View larger version (17K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f41f27org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12939eeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19a4630org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17611ba_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 3:C_FLOATNO Oxygen consumption rates of Carabid species per (a) animal in [ml O2 h-1] and as (b) mass-specific consumption rate [ml O2 h-1 g-1]. Points represent mean oxygen consumption per individual (C. auratus: n = 2; L. assimilis: n = 6; P. versicolor: n = 7; P. niger: n = 6). C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
10.2%
4
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.9%
5
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
10
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
14
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
16
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
17
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
23
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%