Back

Development and Temporal Validation of a Simple Admission-Based Model Predicting 90-Day Outcomes After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Nakayashiki, A.; Umezawa, K.; Nishijima, Y.; Suzuki, R.; Yokosawa, M.; Endo, H.

2026-04-30 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.28.26352003 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDEarly prognostic stratification of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is clinically important. We developed and temporally validated an admission-based prediction model for 90-day outcomes in a cohort of patients with aSAH. METHODSConsecutive treatment-eligible patients with aSAH, managed at a single center between January 2021 and December 2025, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients treated from 2021-2023 and 2024-2025 comprised the development and temporal validation cohorts, respectively. Prediction models were developed using admission variables, including age, pre-morbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade, modified Fisher grade, and intracerebral hemorrhage on initial computed tomography. The primary outcome was a 90-day mRS score of 0-3. A sensitivity model was constructed for 90-day mRS scores of 0-2. RESULTSA total of 245 patients were included (development cohort: 160; validation cohort: 85); 107 patients were aged [≥] 70 years. For mRS 0-3, the model demonstrated good discrimination in both the development and validation cohorts (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.917 and 0.868), while mRS 0-2 had corresponding AUCs of 0.920 and 0.840, respectively. Among patients aged [≥] 70 years, the validation AUCs were 0.842 and 0.768 for mRS scores of 0-3 and 0-2, respectively. Calibration was acceptable overall but less stable in older patients. CONCLUSIONSIn an aSAH cohort with a substantial proportion of older patients, an admission-based five-variable model provided 90-day outcome prediction with good discrimination on temporal validation. This tool may facilitate early risk stratification at admission, pending multicenter external validation. CLINICAL PERSPECTIVEO_ST_ABSWhat is New?C_ST_ABSO_LIWe developed and temporally validated a simple admission-based prediction model for 90-day functional outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in a contemporary, consecutive, single-center cohort comprising a substantial proportion of older patients. C_LIO_LIBased on five readily available admission variables, the model showed good discrimination in both the overall population and the subgroup aged [≥] 70 years, with additional support for clinical utility from decision curve analysis and an exploratory external assessment in an independent published cohort. C_LI What are the Clinical Implications?O_LIAdmission-based prediction may support early prognostic estimation, family counseling, and initial risk stratification at admission when treatment-related information is unavailable. C_LIO_LIBecause the cohort comprised treatment-eligible patients who received active aneurysm treatment, the model was intended for prognostic estimation rather than for guiding treatment allocation or withdrawal decisions. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
2
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
30
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%