Back

Rapid Diffusion, Persistent Deserts: A National Longitudinal Study of Geographic Access to Hospitals with AI Deployment, 2022 to 2024

Johnson, A.; Gefen, D.; Harrison, T.

2026-04-29 health policy
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351957 medRxiv
Show abstract

Measured hospital AI deployment expanded between 2022 and 2024, but did the geography of access converge, and did persistent access deserts overlap with greater health burden? Using two waves of the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey linked to 2020 Census block-group populations, we estimate contiguous-U.S. coverage for 329.3 million residents and full-frame transition profiles for 334.7 million residents. Measured AI-enabled status is identified using five binary workforce/workflow AI-use items in 2022 and fourteen ordinal clinical and operational AI implementation items in 2024 (primary 2024 threshold: expanding or fully integrated). The share of hospitals reporting active AI deployment rose from 18.3% to 28.6%. Contiguous-U.S. coverage within a 30-minute drive increased from 67.0% to 76.1%, yet spatial inequality grew: the population-weighted Gini coefficient of access distances rose from 0.739 to 0.767. In the full transition frame, 45.1 million people newly crossed the 30-minute threshold, while 67.9 million remained outside it in both waves: 37.2 million experienced no travel-time improvement and 30.7 million improved but still did not cross the threshold. These findings reveal a diffusion paradox: measured expansion coexists with persistent and, by some measures, rising inequality in who benefits. The communities left behind are not randomly distributed; they are more rural, lower-income, higher-poverty, older, more uninsured, and carry higher baseline premature-mortality burden than persistently served communities. A pre-diffusion Years of Potential Life Lost (YPLL) check showed that the mortality-burden gradient was already present before the 2022-2024 diffusion window, supporting a burden-overlap interpretation rather than causal mortality evidence. O_TEXTBOXSignificance StatementUsing two AHA survey waves (2022-2024), we estimate contiguous-U.S. 30-minute coverage for 329.3 million residents and full-frame transition profiles for 334.7 million residents. Coverage rose from 67.0% to 76.1%, yet spatial inequality increased (Gini 0.739 to 0.767; bootstrap p < 0.05). In the full transition frame, 67.9 million people remained outside 30-minute access in both waves, including 37.2 million with no travel-time improvement. Persistently excluded communities also carried higher baseline premature mortality, and a pre-diffusion check showed that this gradient was already present before the 2022-2024 diffusion window, making the access pattern a health-equity concern rather than only a geography-of-technology finding. C_TEXTBOX

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
2
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
6.8%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
6
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
8
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.1%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.5%
10
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
The Lancet Global Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
13
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
16
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.9%
21
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%