Back

Attributional bias in epilepsy: differences between genetic generalised epilepsy, temporal lobe epilepsy and healthy controls

Pytelova, V.; Gatialova, E.; Zalud, J.; Modrak, M.; Ksirova, E.; Kalinova, M.; Kalina, A.; Marusic, P.; Amlerova, J.

2026-04-29 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351955 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAttributional bias, a tendency to overinterpret others intentions as hostile (rather than situational or accidental), represents a component of social cognition and may affect everyday functioning. Neural models link attributional processing to fronto-temporal circuits and the default mode network, which are frequently altered in epilepsy. Difficulties in social participation and employment are common in people with epilepsy, and maladaptive attributional styles may contribute to these challenges. Attributional bias has not been systematically compared across epilepsy syndromes. MethodsWe examined attributional bias in 96 participants comprising 26 individuals with genetic generalised epilepsy (GGE), 27 with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and 43 healthy controls (HC). Attributional style was assessed using the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire. Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory in Epilepsy. Group differences were analysed, and potential clinical and demographical correlates were explored. ResultsThe GGE group exhibited higher hostility bias scores than HC (95% CI: 0.12-0.38, adjusted p = 0.014), whereas the difference between TLE and HC groups was moderate and not statistically significant (95% CI: 0.12-0.58, adjusted p = 0.059). Higher blame scores were positively associated with depressive symptoms (p = 0.016). Disease duration, seizure frequency, and antiseizure medication were not significantly associated with attributional bias. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that some individuals with genetic generalised epilepsy are more likely to interpret ambiguous situations as hostile. Altered attributional style may represent an under-recognised factor contributing to social difficulties in people with epilepsy and warrants further investigation as a potential target for psychosocial interventions. HighlightsO_LISome people with epilepsy are more prone to interpret social situations as hostile. C_LIO_LIHigher depression scores correlate with a tendency to blame external factors for misfortunes. C_LIO_LIDisease duration, antiseizure medication, and seizure frequency do not seem to influence the attributional bias. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
3
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Epilepsia Open
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Epilepsy Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
7
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
9
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
17
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
20
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
23
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%