Back

Attributional bias in epilepsy: differences between genetic generalised epilepsy, temporal lobe epilepsy and healthy controls

Pytelova, V.; Gatialova, E.; Zalud, J.; Modrak, M.; Ksirova, E.; Kalinova, M.; Kalina, A.; Marusic, P.; Amlerova, J.

2026-04-29 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351955 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAttributional bias, a tendency to overinterpret others intentions as hostile (rather than situational or accidental), represents a component of social cognition and may affect everyday functioning. Neural models link attributional processing to fronto-temporal circuits and the default mode network, which are frequently altered in epilepsy. Difficulties in social participation and employment are common in people with epilepsy, and maladaptive attributional styles may contribute to these challenges. Attributional bias has not been systematically compared across epilepsy syndromes. MethodsWe examined attributional bias in 96 participants comprising 26 individuals with genetic generalised epilepsy (GGE), 27 with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and 43 healthy controls (HC). Attributional style was assessed using the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire. Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory in Epilepsy. Group differences were analysed, and potential clinical and demographical correlates were explored. ResultsThe GGE group exhibited higher hostility bias scores than HC (95% CI: 0.12-0.38, adjusted p = 0.014), whereas the difference between TLE and HC groups was moderate and not statistically significant (95% CI: 0.12-0.58, adjusted p = 0.059). Higher blame scores were positively associated with depressive symptoms (p = 0.016). Disease duration, seizure frequency, and antiseizure medication were not significantly associated with attributional bias. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that some individuals with genetic generalised epilepsy are more likely to interpret ambiguous situations as hostile. Altered attributional style may represent an under-recognised factor contributing to social difficulties in people with epilepsy and warrants further investigation as a potential target for psychosocial interventions. HighlightsO_LISome people with epilepsy are more prone to interpret social situations as hostile. C_LIO_LIHigher depression scores correlate with a tendency to blame external factors for misfortunes. C_LIO_LIDisease duration, antiseizure medication, and seizure frequency do not seem to influence the attributional bias. C_LI

Published in Epilepsy Research (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

Epilepsy Research · published here
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Epilepsia
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.5%
3
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.1%
5
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
6
Epilepsia Open
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
7
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
8
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
10
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
13
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
17
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
19
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%