Back

Sampling and host-strain interactions shape detection of Staphylococcus aureus transmission in hospitals

Rabii, K. B.; Takats, C.; Putzel, G.; Tillman, A.; Podkowik, M.; McWilliams, J.; Samhadaneh, N.; Shenderovich, J.; Arguelles, N.; Srivastava, A.; Drlica, K.; Torres, V. J.; Pironti, A.; Hochman, S. E.; Renson, A.; Shopsin, B.

2026-04-29 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351952 medRxiv
Show abstract

In principle, whole-genome sequencing of Staphylococcus aureus in hospitals is most effective when used prospectively, but its practical limits are unclear. We performed large-scale genomic surveillance across two interconnected hospitals, sequencing 4,779 S. aureus isolates from admission screening and clinical cultures. Integration of genomic and epidemiologic data identified 361 transmission events undetected by standard surveillance. Despite dense sampling, most events (90%) were detected only at readmission, indicating that transmission escapes recognition during the index hospitalization. Serial or discharge screening is likely required to capture transmission. Detection depended on sampling: clinical isolates alone were insufficient, and nearly all events required screening and repeated sampling. Because such approaches are unlikely to scale if applied universally, surveillance must be targeted. Transmission concentrated in methicillin-resistant strains, and it increased when healthcare exposure aligned with hospital-associated strain lineage. These findings help define the limits of prospective genomic surveillance and provide a framework for targeted detection. Main pointThis work indicates that most MRSA transmission arises from asymptomatic carriers and is detected only after readmission, highlighting the need for targeted serial or discharge screening of high-risk patients to identify and interrupt hospital transmission.

Published in The Journal of Infectious Diseases (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.