Back

Adapting, piloting, and evaluating a pediatric lead screening and risk-reduction intervention in Nairobi: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial protocol

Onoh, I.; Mugo, C.; Riederer, A.; Maleche-Obimbo, E.; Were, F. H.; Loftus, C.; Mukumbang, F.; Lumumba, E.; Richardson, B.; Edemba, P. W.; Mutai, B. C.; Karr, C.; Benki-Nugent, S.

2026-04-30 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351918 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChildhood lead exposure is prevalent worldwide including low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Structured screening and prevention programs to address pediatric lead exposure are largely absent in these settings. Adapted interventions are needed to close this implementation gap in an urban African context. This paper describes the protocol for the Lead Exposure Intervention Program (LEIP), which aims to adapt, pilot, and evaluate a pediatric lead exposure screening and risk-reduction protocol in Nairobi, Kenya. MethodsLEIP is a multi-phase, hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness study. Phase 1 is a formative one-arm study leveraging an existing mother-child cohort and stakeholder-led tools adaptation to pilot a program comprising blood lead level (BLL) screening with a lead risk survey and tailored caregiver risk reduction messaging. Phase 2 is a randomized trial in public sector clinics. In this phase, approximately 1,500 children will be screened to identify 100 with elevated BLL ([≥]5 {micro}g/dL) for enrollment, who will then be randomized 1:1 to receive either clinic-only risk-reduction messaging or the same clinic-based messaging plus a home visit for environmental assessment and additional tailored messaging. Follow-up at 3 and 9 months will assess caregiver recall of key messages and adoption of recommended exposure-reduction behaviors, as well as changes in child BLL. Phase 3 involves qualitative interviews with caregivers and key stakeholders to identify multi-level barriers and facilitators to intervention uptake. Quantitative and qualitative findings will be integrated to inform refinements for scale-up. DiscussionThis study represents a critical opportunity to develop and evaluate an adaptive, screening-based lead exposure intervention tailored to the urban LMIC context. By incorporating implementation science principles and stakeholder-driven design, LEIP is well-positioned to inform scalable national and regional approaches. The inclusion of both quantitative and qualitative components enhances the protocols ability to capture multilevel dynamics of uptake, fidelity, and sustainability, and generate actionable insights for future large-scale implementations. Trial RegistrationRegistered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07401251)

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
26.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
3
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
6
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
10
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
16
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
20
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
25
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%