Back

Adapting, piloting, and evaluating a pediatric lead screening and risk-reduction intervention in Nairobi: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial protocol

Onoh, I.; Mugo, C.; Riederer, A.; Maleche-Obimbo, E.; Were, F. H.; Loftus, C.; Mukumbang, F.; Lumumba, E.; Richardson, B.; Edemba, P. W.; Mutai, B. C.; Karr, C.; Benki-Nugent, S.

2026-04-30 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351918 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChildhood lead exposure is prevalent worldwide including low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Structured screening and prevention programs to address pediatric lead exposure are largely absent in these settings. Adapted interventions are needed to close this implementation gap in an urban African context. This paper describes the protocol for the Lead Exposure Intervention Program (LEIP), which aims to adapt, pilot, and evaluate a pediatric lead exposure screening and risk-reduction protocol in Nairobi, Kenya. MethodsLEIP is a multi-phase, hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness study. Phase 1 is a formative one-arm study leveraging an existing mother-child cohort and stakeholder-led tools adaptation to pilot a program comprising blood lead level (BLL) screening with a lead risk survey and tailored caregiver risk reduction messaging. Phase 2 is a randomized trial in public sector clinics. In this phase, approximately 1,500 children will be screened to identify 100 with elevated BLL ([≥]5 {micro}g/dL) for enrollment, who will then be randomized 1:1 to receive either clinic-only risk-reduction messaging or the same clinic-based messaging plus a home visit for environmental assessment and additional tailored messaging. Follow-up at 3 and 9 months will assess caregiver recall of key messages and adoption of recommended exposure-reduction behaviors, as well as changes in child BLL. Phase 3 involves qualitative interviews with caregivers and key stakeholders to identify multi-level barriers and facilitators to intervention uptake. Quantitative and qualitative findings will be integrated to inform refinements for scale-up. DiscussionThis study represents a critical opportunity to develop and evaluate an adaptive, screening-based lead exposure intervention tailored to the urban LMIC context. By incorporating implementation science principles and stakeholder-driven design, LEIP is well-positioned to inform scalable national and regional approaches. The inclusion of both quantitative and qualitative components enhances the protocols ability to capture multilevel dynamics of uptake, fidelity, and sustainability, and generate actionable insights for future large-scale implementations. Trial RegistrationRegistered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07401251)

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
33.9%
2
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
4
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
PLOS ONE · published here
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.4%
6
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
7
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
PLOS Water
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
10
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
14
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
15
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
21
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
The Lancet Global Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
23
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%