Back

An Interpretable Deep Learning Framework Reveals Frontoparietal Control Network Hyperactivation Underlying Autism Diagnosis and Symptom Severity

Ran, C.; Ye, c.; Ma, T.

2026-04-29 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351834 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is marked by profound neurobiological heterogeneity, which drives inconsistent neuroimaging findings and impede the discovery of reliable biomarkers for precise diagnosis and phenotypic prediction. Although deep learning has shown promising predictive power, its black-box nature obscures the mechanistic interpretability underlying high-dimensional learned representations, limiting their translation into actionable neurobiological insights. METHODSWe present IBSS-GAT, a novel interpretable deep learning framework that explicitly models the spatiotemporal landscape of individual-specific internal brain states and integrates a two-stage mechanistic interpretability pipeline to bridge model-derived features to well-characterized neurodynamic processes and clinical phenotypes. RESULTSAcross three independent large-scale neuroimaging cohorts, IBSS-GAT achieved state-of-the-art classification performance in both cognitive decoding (99.30% accuracy in the HCP-task cohort) and ASD identification (77.26% accuracy in the ABIDE-I, and 77.49% accuracy in the ABIDE-II). Interpretability analyses revealed the frontoparietal control network (FPCN) as a convergent hallmark of ASD, mechanistically anchored in the pathological hyperexpression of an FPCN-dominated metastate. Moreover, both the increased metastate occupancy and model-derived feature strength of FPCN emerged as robust predictors of clinical symptom severity in ASD across ABIDE-I and ABIDE-II. CONCLUSIONSOur work establishes a robust, mechanistically interpretable link between individual high-dimensional brain dynamics and heterogeneous ASD phenotypes, revealing generalizable, neurobiologically grounded brain markers with the potential to inform precision medicine in ASD.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.8%
3
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.2%
4
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
5
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
6
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
10
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.4%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
12
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
Molecular Autism
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
18
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
23
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
29
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%