Back

An Interpretable Deep Learning Framework Reveals Frontoparietal Control Network Hyperactivation Underlying Autism Diagnosis and Symptom Severity

Ran, C.; Ye, c.; Ma, T.

2026-04-29 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.28.26351834 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is marked by profound neurobiological heterogeneity, which drives inconsistent neuroimaging findings and impede the discovery of reliable biomarkers for precise diagnosis and phenotypic prediction. Although deep learning has shown promising predictive power, its black-box nature obscures the mechanistic interpretability underlying high-dimensional learned representations, limiting their translation into actionable neurobiological insights. METHODSWe present IBSS-GAT, a novel interpretable deep learning framework that explicitly models the spatiotemporal landscape of individual-specific internal brain states and integrates a two-stage mechanistic interpretability pipeline to bridge model-derived features to well-characterized neurodynamic processes and clinical phenotypes. RESULTSAcross three independent large-scale neuroimaging cohorts, IBSS-GAT achieved state-of-the-art classification performance in both cognitive decoding (99.30% accuracy in the HCP-task cohort) and ASD identification (77.26% accuracy in the ABIDE-I, and 77.49% accuracy in the ABIDE-II). Interpretability analyses revealed the frontoparietal control network (FPCN) as a convergent hallmark of ASD, mechanistically anchored in the pathological hyperexpression of an FPCN-dominated metastate. Moreover, both the increased metastate occupancy and model-derived feature strength of FPCN emerged as robust predictors of clinical symptom severity in ASD across ABIDE-I and ABIDE-II. CONCLUSIONSOur work establishes a robust, mechanistically interpretable link between individual high-dimensional brain dynamics and heterogeneous ASD phenotypes, revealing generalizable, neurobiologically grounded brain markers with the potential to inform precision medicine in ASD.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
2
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 19%
8.9%
4
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.9%
5
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.9%
6
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Mental Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
8
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
9
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
Molecular Autism
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.5%
14
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
19
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
22
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%