Back

Fast learning, memorization and generalization: A computational characterization of sparse to dense hippocampal-cortical codes

Sasan, A.; Mok, R. M.

2026-04-30 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.27.721238 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Classic findings from neuropsychology and animal studies established the hippocampus as a key substrate for rapid learning and episodic memory, with the dentate gyrus exhibiting extreme sparse coding. Sparse coding has long been hypothesized to enable fast learning through pattern separation, enabling rapid separation of highly similar inputs. However, prior computational work has largely focused on episodic memory or simplified linear tasks, leaving open how hippocampal sparsity affects learning speed and generalization in complex tasks. Here, we present a systematic investigation of sparse coding in deep neural networks varying the sparsity level and location (layer depth) and evaluated the functional consequences for learning and generalization. We found that learning performance is maximized at a balanced sparsity level of [~]5%, matching empirical estimates of the hippocampal sparse code. Dimensionality and representational similarity analyses revealed that sparse layers promoted orthogonalization of input representations, mirroring hippocampal pattern separation that enables fast learning. Furthermore, sparsity in early layers led to fast learning only on the training set and poor generalization to a held out test set, reflecting memorization, while sparsity in later layers consistently aided generalization, providing implications for theories of hippocampal-cortical learning. Our findings demonstrate the power and tradeoffs of the hippocampal sparse code, and show how hippocampal-cortical circuits possess the computational capacity to support both fast learning and generalization, depending on where sparsity is implemented. We offer a unifying perspective on how the hippocampus works as a fast, sparse memory system and the hippocampal-cortical pathway as a mechanism for generalizable learning.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.1%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.9%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.8%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 15%
7.3%
5
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
7
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
9
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.3%
10
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.7%
13
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
18
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
20
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
22
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
23
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%