Back

Sniffing Shapes Dopamine Signals for Reward Prediction

Scheller, M. F.; Luis, C.; Kelsch, W.

2026-04-30 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.27.721190 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adaptive behaviors depend on predicting outcomes from sensory evidence. Dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) broadcast reward-prediction signals that guide learning. Yet the principles functionally coordinating information flow from input regions to VTA are incompletely understood. In the olfactory system, the sniff cycle structures sampling and odor encoding. We therefore asked whether this rhythm also entrains the ventral striatum to VTA communication and if so, how this shapes the implementation of predictive coding in dopamine neurons. We recorded identified dopamine neurons throughout olfactory conditioning and found that their firing shifted systematically to the post-inspiratory phase of the sniff cycle with learning. This temporal realignment predicted a neurons engagement in value encoding along the optimism-pessimism-spectrum of distributional reinforcement learning. This is associated with an enhanced phase-gated communication channel from the striatal olfactory tubercle to dopamine neurons, the strength of which predicts task performance. Thus, the sniffing rhythm provides a scaffold for information flow, revealing a phase-gating mechanism for the integration of outcome predicting sensory evidence to dopamine neurons during reinforcement learning. Significance StatementPredicting the future from sensory cues is central to adaptive behaviors. We show that sniffing temporally organizes the flow of information between the olfactory tubercle of ventral striatum and midbrain dopamine neurons during odor-guided learning in mice. Phase-specific coupling in the respiratory cycle determines when sensory information reaches dopamine neurons and how predictive signals are encoded. These findings link active-sensing rhythms to predictive reinforcement signals. This temporal scaffold yields a gradient of "optimistic" to "pessimistic" predictions consistent with distributional reinforcement-learning theories. These insights contribute to a better understanding of the large-scale computations across multiple brain regions to predict future outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.