Back

An integrated RNA-centric imaging and omics approach reveals distinct properties and composition of neuronal RNA granules

Rogow, J. A.; Doron-Mandel, E.; Cutler, R.; Nunez, L.; Vazquez, R.; Harris, L.; Jovanovic, M.; Singer, R. H.; Das, S.

2026-04-30 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.27.721160 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RNA granules are essential regulators of post-transcriptional gene expression, enabling mRNA transport, localization, and local translation in neurons. The localized transcriptome is diverse; however, how different mRNAs are organized into granules for efficient localization and translation remains unknown. Here, we combine real-time endogenous single RNA imaging with protein and RNA proximity labeling to investigate two distinct endogenous neuronal mRNA granule populations, Actb and Arc, in stimulated primary hippocampal neurons. Using orthogonal RNA labeling systems in a dual knock-in mouse model, we show that Actb and Arc mRNAs are packaged into spatially segregated granules with distinct trafficking dynamics, localization kinetics, and responses to synaptic stimulation. Actb granules displayed rapid and sustained localization, whereas Arc granules showed delayed, transient recruitment, consistent with their respective roles in structural and activity-dependent plasticity. Proximity labeling reveals that these granules are distinct in their mRNA composition, despite sharing core RNA-binding proteins, suggesting that shared cis-regulatory elements within mRNA 3UTR regions drive selective co-packaging of mRNAs into unique granules. Together, these findings demonstrate that neuronal mRNAs are differentially sorted into molecularly and functionally distinct granules, providing a framework for understanding how precise spatio-temporal control of mRNA localization and translation is achieved across complex neuronal arbors.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.