Back

Charged agar surfaces affect E. coli biofilm properties by balancing curli amyloid quantity and quality

Siri, M.; Vazquez-Davila, M.; Bidan, C. M.

2026-04-28 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.27.721109 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biofilm extracellular matrix (ECM) varies with environmental conditions and substrate properties. Understanding the surface-biofilm relationship helps to perfect antibacterial strategies and to design new engineered living materials (ELMs). In this work, we studied how cationic and anionic polyelectrolyte coatings affect macroscopic features of Escherichia coli curli-producing biofilms, as well as the properties of their curli amyloid fibers. Cationic coatings limited biofilm spreading, increased their surface density and water absorption, which correlated with a higher yield of curli amyloid fibers with looser structure. In contrast, anionic surfaces allowed for standard biofilm spreading, with a lower fiber yield but a more compact and chemically stable fiber structure. Higher biofilm rigidity and adhesion were measured on both types of charged surfaces. Thus, we propose that the differences in biofilm macroscopic properties result from a trade-off between curli quantity and quality in the ECM, namely fiber density and molecular packing, as well as their interaction with water. Our findings provide insights on how the biophysical properties of the ECM can be controlled by tuning the substrate physico-chemical characteristics with charged coatings. This work opens up new avenues for developing antimicrobial strategies, as well as tailoring the properties of amyloid-based ELMs. TOC figure O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=82 SRC="FIGDIR/small/721109v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (22K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@191cd79org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@148f914org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d8c2f8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e84eaf_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
6
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
8
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
13
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
20
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
23
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
25
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
26
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
27
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
28
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
29
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
30
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%