Back

Phytochemical profiling, antioxidant capacity, and in vivo safety assessment of Warrigal spinach (Tetragonia tetragonioides) and Kensington Pride mango (Mangifera indica) extracts using Zebrafish larvae

Kiloni, S.; Ali, A.; Dunshea, F.; Cottrell, J.; Caceres-Velez, P. R.; Jusuf, P. R.

2026-04-30 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.04.27.720960 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plant-derived bioactive compounds are recognised for their antioxidant potential and benefit for human diseases, including age-related diseases caused by oxidative stress. However, their antioxidant composition and safety profiles remain insufficiently understood. This study integrates phytochemical profiling, antioxidant evaluation, and in vivo toxicological assessment of Warrigal spinach (Tetragonia tetragonioides) and Kensington Pride mango (Mangifera indica). Spinach exhibited greater antioxidant capacity, and higher total phenolic and flavonoid content than mango: TPC (14.2 {+/-} 0.6 mg GAE/g vs 1.30 {+/-} 0.07 mg GAE/g) and TFC (9.61 {+/-} 0.39 mg QE/g vs 0.08 {+/-} 0.0 mg QE/g). LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS identified 187 metabolites dominated by flavonoids (53.5%) and phenolic acids (16%), with spinach showing greater chemical diversity. Quantitative analysis revealed higher levels of hydroxycinnamic acids and flavonoid glycosides in spinach, whereas mango contained distinct metabolites, including mangiferin and pyrogallol. Zebrafish embryo / larval assays demonstrated high safety margins, with LC50 values of 478.8 mg/L (spinach) and >480 mg/L (mango). At 480 mg/L spinach displayed developmental abnormalities and malformations. These findings demonstrate that antioxidant capacity is linked to phenolic composition, but does not predict toxicity. Thus, integrated phytochemical and safety evaluation for extracts with complex compound mixtures are critical to identify botanicals suitable for future drug development. HighlightsO_LIWarrigal spinach exhibited >10-fold higher phenolic content and antioxidant capacity than Kensington Pride mango. C_LIO_LILC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS identified 187 metabolites, with flavonoids as the dominant phytochemical class. C_LIO_LIZebrafish assays confirmed high safety margins, demonstrating no direct correlation between antioxidant capacity and toxicity. C_LI O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=114 SRC="FIGDIR/small/720960v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (30K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c885dborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cbed43org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@460182org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d1ec5_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Graphical abstract C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Food Chemistry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
10
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
11
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
14
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
NeuroToxicology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
21
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
22
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
24
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
25
The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
26
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
27
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
29
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%