Back

What do fishermen think? Local perspectives on human crocodile co-existence in Lake Nasser

Ezat, M. A.; Van Langevelde, F.; Naguib, M.

2026-04-29 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.27.720860 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The increasing impact of humans on natural habitats leads to an increase in human-wildlife conflict (HWC), specifically when there is competition for shared resources. In freshwater systems such as Lake Nasser, Egypt, co-occurrence of local fishermen communities with Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus) poses critical challenges for both livelihoods and biodiversity conservation. Understanding local perception of crocodiles by local fishermen is therefore essential for developing effective and socially accepted management responses. We used a structured questionnaire to assess how fishermen perceive and respond to crocodiles across three attitudinal domains: (1) perceived threats, (2) perceived economic benefits, and (3) conservation or co-existence values. Forty-two fishermen were interviewed across multiple khors (side arms of the lake). The responses showed a multifaceted picture: while many local fishermen associated crocodiles with gear damage, reduced catches, and livelihood risks, support for crocodile protection and recognition of their ecological role were also widespread. Interest in crocodile-based livelihood opportunities, such as harvesting or collecting the hatchlings, was generally low, suggesting social, cultural, or legal barriers to such approaches. Fishing experience influenced perceptions, with fishermen encountering crocodiles more frequently reporting decreased catches and greater concern. Cluster analysis further revealed three different respondent groups with different attitudes: conflict-oriented, moderate, and coexistence-oriented. Support for crocodile protection was the strongest predictor of belonging to the pro-co-existence group. Our findings underscore the complexity of human- crocodile co-occurrence in Lake Nasser and, on a wider scale, add to the existing cautions against simplistic mitigations of local HWC. Effective conservation and livelihood interventions will require participatory, context-sensitive approaches that integrate the different perceptions and attitudes of local people.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
25.9%
2
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
8
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
9
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
26
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%