Back

Disrupting the clock of the Madeira cockroach through RNAi-mediated knockdown of CLOCK and CYCLE

Zolmon, H.; Trummel, T.; Kräling, L.; Przybylla, P.; Schneider, A. C.; Stursberg, O.; Stengl, M.

2026-04-30 physiology
10.64898/2026.04.27.720303 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Endogenous circadian clocks control circadian rhythms in physiology and behavior. The predominant hypothesis of biological timing suggests that the responsible master clock for all endogenous circadian rhythms is constituted by an evolutionary conserved transcriptional-translational feedback loop (TTFL) clock consisting of positive feedforward and negative feedback elements. Unexpectedly, in contrast to the evolutionary derived insect Drosophila, RNAi-dependent knockdown of any of the negative feedback elements of the core TTFL clock in the basal Madeira cockroach Rhyparobia maderae does not delete circadian rhythms in locomotor activity. Shown here, neither RNAi-dependent triple knockdowns of all three negative feedback elements Period, Timeless 1, and Cryptochrome 2, nor single and double knockdown of the positive elements Clock and Cycle did directly delete circadian locomotor rhythms as mRNA levels declined. Thus, our experimental data do not support the predominant hierarchical hypothesis of circadian timing. To explore alternative mechanisms, we constructed a computational model of a neuronal circadian pacemaker network using planar switching affine systems (PSAS). The PSAS model comprises plasma membrane-associated posttranslational feedback loop (PTFL) clocks that are coupled to the TTFL nuclear clocks. Modeling results aligned with our experimental results. Therefore, both our experimental and modeling data support a systemic hypothesis of biological timing. 3 Significance statementBased mostly upon genetic studies in derived taxa like Drosophila it is hypothesized that circadian timing of behavior is strictly controlled by specific circadian clock neurons in the brain, realized through a transcriptional-translational feedback loop (TTFL) clock. In contrast to this common hierarchical model that requires transcription, we provide evidence in a basal taxon - the Madeira cockroach - for a systemic explanation of circadian timing of behavior that is based on coupled TTFL and posttranslational feedback loop (PTFL) clocks in adaptive neuronal networks.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.1%
4
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
8
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
9
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
10
Journal of Biological Rhythms
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.0%
12
Biosystems
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
13
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Biogerontology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.4%
16
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
17
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
18
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.2%
20
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
25
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Systems Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
29
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%