Back

Single-Cell-Validated Transcriptomic Proxies for the Maas Meningioma Microenvironment Risk Continuum: An NF2-Dependent Signal Attenuated Below Detectability in Bulk RNA-seq

Piccolo, D.; Vindigni, M.

2026-04-28 surgery
10.64898/2026.04.27.26351840 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeMaas et al. recently showed that a microenvironment-determined risk continuum, driven by the shift from microglia-like to myeloid-derived macrophage-like tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), independently predicts meningioma progression beyond WHO grade. Whether this gradient is recoverable from bulk RNA-seq has not been tested. MethodsWe computed a microglia-to-macrophage ssGSEA ratio using expanded gene sets (15 microglia, 17 macrophage) anchored to Maas core markers across 968 meningiomas from 5 GEO datasets, validated it against pseudo-bulk profiles from the Maas snRNA-seq cohort (n=25), and tested recurrence-free survival (RFS) association by Cox regression in a 101-patient subset (73 events, median follow-up 110.2 months). ResultsThe ratio correlated with single-cell microglia proportion (overlap-controlled r=0.70, 95% CI 0.42-0.86) and discriminated WHO grades and transcriptomic clusters, confirming biological recoverability. The ratio did not predict RFS (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72-1.16, p=0.46). A quantitative attenuation analysis predicts the Maas IHC HR of 2.00 attenuates to HR 1.24-1.40 after proxy measurement error (r2=0.22-0.49) and NF2-wildtype dilution (30-45%), yielding only 15-40% power at 73 events. An exploratory NF2-expression proxy subgroup (uncorrected p=0.056) showed a trend in NF2-low tumors (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46-1.01) absent in NF2-high tumors (HR 0.98, p=0.89). The Chen 34-gene tumor-intrinsic panel also reached near-chance discrimination (C-index 0.552). ConclusionSingle-cell-anchored ssGSEA recovers the Maas gradient in bulk RNA-seq but attenuates it below detectability in moderate-sized, NF2-unselected cohorts. The prognostic component is bounded by power and NF2 stratification, not an intrinsic modality failure; NF2-annotated cohorts with approximately 480 events are required for definitive testing.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 5%
18.8%
2
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
5
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
6
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
11
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.3%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.3%
21
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
24
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
27
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%