Perceived Consequences and Catastrophising Help Explain Health-Related Quality of Life in Parkinson Disease. A Cross-Sectional Study.

IntroductionMotor complications are major determinants of disability in Parkinsons disease (PD), yet clinician-rated motor complication severity does not fully explain variability in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Research questionTo examine the contribution of illness perceptions and cognitive-behavioural responses to HRQoL alongside motor complication severity in people with PD. MethodsThis multi-centre, cross-sectional study recruited 58 people with idiopathic PD (median age 68 years; 55.2% male; 48.3% from minoritised ethnic backgrounds; Hoehn & Yahr stage 2-3). All underwent assessment of motor complications (Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale; MDS-UPDRS Part IV) and HRQoL (Parkinsons Disease Questionnaire-39 Summary Index; PDQ-39 SI). Illness perceptions were measured with Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R) Part 2, and cognitive-behavioural responses with Cognitive and Behavioural Responses Questionnaire (CBRQ). Regression models were adjusted for age, sex, disease duration, motor severity (MDS-UPDRS Part III), levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), anxiety, depression, and cognitive function. A subset (n=47) completed 7-day Parkinsons KinetiGraph monitoring. ResultsDemographic and clinical covariates explained 77.3% of variance in HRQoL (R{superscript 2}=0.773). Adding motor complication severity explained a significant additional 3.7% ({Delta}R{superscript 2}=0.037, P=0.004). Subsequent inclusion of illness consequences (IPQ-R) and catastrophising (CBRQ) explained a further 4.1% ({Delta}R{superscript 2}=0.041, P=0.004), yielding a final adjusted R{superscript 2} of 0.815. In the fully adjusted model, catastrophising (B=0.797, P=0.027) and perceived consequences (B=0.767, P=0.013) remained independently associated with HRQoL. ConclusionHRQoL in PD appears to depend not only on motor complication severity, but also on patients interpretations and responses. Clinicians should assess both to guide holistic care and support adaptive coping.