Back

Whole Genome HPV Liquid Biopsy for Pan-HPV-Associated Cancer Detection and Viral Physical State Classification

Fisch, A. S.; Abruzzo, A. R.; Eldfors, S.; Das, D.; Wang, Q.; Lumaj, G.; Shukla, S.; Gockley, A. A.; Wo, J. Y.; Hong, T. S.; Russo, A. L.; Richmon, J. D.; Giap, F.; Alzumaili, B. A.; Faquin, W. C.; Sadow, P. M.; Faden, D. L.

2026-04-29 oncology
10.64898/2026.04.27.26350528 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeHPV-associated carcinomas (HPV+ cancers) account for 5% of all cancers. Circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPVDNA) assays for HPV+ cancer surveillance have limited prognostic utility at the time of cancer diagnosis. While HPV integration into the host genome is a proven tissue-based biomarker predicting poor clinical outcomes, existing clinically utilized ctHPVDNA assays cannot classify the viral physical state. MethodsWe previously developed HPV-DeepSeek, a multi-feature HPV whole-genome sequencing liquid biopsy with 99% diagnostic accuracy at the time of HPV+ oropharynx cancer diagnosis. We test the diagnostic accuracy of HPV-DeepSeek in a cohort of 235 HPV+ cancers across nine anatomic sites and employ a novel blood-based computational classifier to infer HPV genome physical state from plasma, termed HPV-SIGNAL, to assess its prognostic potential. ResultsHPV-DeepSeek demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 99%. In 181 eligible samples, HPV-SIGNAL identified four viral physical states: episomal-only (N = 69), episomal-rearranged (N = 48), integrated-mixed (N = 55), and integrated-clonal (N = 9), which were confirmed and further elucidated via three orthogonal tissue and blood approaches. Patients harboring integrated viral states in the blood exhibited significantly worse progression-free survival (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.63-6.58, p = 0.00084) and overall survival (HR 2.98, 95% CI 1.16-7.64, p = 0.023) compared to patients with episomal states. ConclusionHPV whole-genome sequencing liquid biopsy has high diagnostic accuracy across HPV+ cancer types and can be used to identify and classify HPV physical state from blood. Patients with integrated viral states detected in the blood demonstrated worse progression-free and overall survival, suggesting blood-based HPV physical state classification could be used as a prognostic tool at the time of cancer diagnosis. Translational RelevanceCurrent circulating tumor HPV DNA assays for HPV-associated cancer surveillance have limited prognostic utility at the time of cancer diagnosis. While HPV integration into the host genome is a proven tissue-based biomarker predicting poor clinical outcomes, existing circulating tumor HPV DNA assays cannot classify the viral physical state. Here, we show that HPV-SIGNAL, a novel blood-based computational classifier to infer HPV genome physical state from plasma using output from HPV-DeepSeek, an HPV whole genome sequencing liquid biopsy, accurately identifies and classifies HPV physical state from blood and is prognostic of progression-free and overall survival across HPV-associated cancer types.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
7.0%
3
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
6
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
9
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
16
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%