Back

Dissociable species-specific impact of Aβ on static and dynamic functional connectomes

Grudny, M. M.; Rodriguez, N.; Murdy, T. J.; Simon, Z. D.; Vo, Q.; Li, W.; Burns, M. R.; Lamb, D. G.; Kaczorowski, C. C.; Chakrabarty, P.; Febo, M.

2026-04-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.26.720907 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Temporal dynamics in functional connectomes provide a physiologically grounded signature of 'hidden' pathologies during preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated the effect of beta-amyloid (A{beta}) on dynamic functional connectomes in transgenic mice and human subjects. Functional magnetic resonance images (fMRI) were collected in two strains of A{beta} mice. fMRI-derived connectomes were segmented into discrete states using a hidden Markov model, and network strength, efficiency, and transitivity were analyzed per state. Human fMRI-derived connectome measures were analyzed across 3 states. Static network measures were significantly different between A{beta} mice and controls, the former having high values for strength, efficiency and clustering coefficient in anterior cingulate, hippocampus, and retrosplenium. Dynamic network measures were stable within-states in A{beta} mice. Similarly, human subjects with high A{beta} had high node strength in precuneus and temporoparietal areas compared to low A{beta}. Conversely, high A{beta} was associated with high switch rates, high fractional occupancy, and state dwell times. Also, global strength, efficiency, and transitivity were less stable within states in the high A{beta} group. Our results indicate that static, but not dynamic, connectome strength, efficiency, and network integration are increased in A{beta} mice, while dynamic network states appear less stable in human functional connectomes. This data supports a dissociable, species-specific impact of A{beta}, with dynamic network alterations present in humans but not in A{beta} mouse models, suggesting additional non-A{beta}-driven influences on dynamic functional connectivity in preclinical AD.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.1%
3
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.4%
4
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
6
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
9
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
14
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
20
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
25
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%