Back

Selection favors context-dependent bias in altruism

Bavik, L. M.; Mehta, R. S.; Weissman, D. B.

2026-04-29 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.26.720906 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Altruism, in which individuals sacrifice some of their own reproduction to help others, can evolve if it is preferentially directed toward relatives. Organisms may recognize relatives through phenotypic similarity. Under the models originally studied by Hamilton, the threshold relatedness at which altruism becomes beneficial depends on the overall relatedness of the population. Implicit in this result is that natural selection may favor context-dependent strategies, in which donors judge their similarity to potential recipients relative to their similarity to the overall population when deciding whether to help. In this manuscript, we use a combination of simulations and theory to determine the circumstances under which context dependence is favored over simple strategies that do not depend on the observation of other interacting individuals. We find that a "plastic" strategy that uses the population context in its rule for donating consistently beats strategies that use only information about the potential recipient.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.6%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.8%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 4%
13.8%
4
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.1%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.4%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.4%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
9
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
10
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
15
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
17
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
21
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%
28
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%