Back

Haplotype-specific expression of a terpene synthase underlies linalool variation in the grapevine cultivar Riesling

Lin, J.; Massonnet, M.; Cochetel, N.; Lerno, L.; Diaz-Garcia, L.; Domenech-Lopez, M.; Figueroa-Balderas, R.; Ebeler, S. E.; Cantu, D.

2026-04-29 plant biology
10.64898/2026.04.26.720724 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Grapevine cultivars vary widely in monoterpenoid content, yet the genetic and regulatory mechanisms underlying this variation remain poorly characterized beyond highly aromatic Muscat types. We profiled free volatiles and monoterpenoid glycosides in a Riesling x Cabernet Sauvignon F1 mapping population, revealing extensive variation and transgressive segregation consistent with multigenic control. QTL mapping identified 59 significant loci associated with 47 volatile compounds and monoterpene glycosides, including two major QTLs explaining 33.8% and 32.4% of phenotypic variance in (3S)-linalool accumulation. Integration of haplotype-resolved transcriptomics with metabolite data, enabled by a chromosome-scale diploid Riesling genome assembly, resolved a (3S)-linalool/nerolidol synthase cluster on chromosome 10 and identified VviTPS54 as the strongest candidate underlying linalool variation. VviTPS54 exhibited haplotype-specific expression strongly correlated with (3S)-linalool accumulation across genotypes, while no QTL was detected at the VviDXS1 locus and VviDXS1 expression was not correlated with terpene levels, indicating that regulatory variation within terpene synthase clusters, rather than methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway flux, drives monoterpenoid composition in this population. These results establish regulatory variation of terpene synthases as a key mechanism underlying monoterpenoid diversity in grapevine and demonstrate that resolving such variation requires haplotype-phased genome assemblies coupled with haplotype-resolved transcriptomics to detect allele-specific expression differences at complex, heterozygous loci.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
18.0%
2
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.1%
4
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
5
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.3%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 11%
4.7%
8
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
9
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.9%
10
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
11
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.1%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 17%
2.1%
15
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
17
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
19
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
22
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
23
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%