From simulation to pedagogy: structured AI standardized patients for clinical communication training validated through multi-model and randomized evaluation
Wu, P.; Han, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Jiang, M.; Lu, X.; Zhang, H.; Xu, D.; Ming, H.; Wang, L.; Wen, Q.
Show abstract
Standardized patients (SPs) are central to clinical communication training but are constrained by cost, scalability, and reliance on trained actors. We present AI standardized patients (AI-SPs), large language model-driven simulators governed by a three-layer information architecture that modulates disclosure according to learner skill. We validate this approach across three phases. In Phase 1, blinded expert evaluation of 350 simulated consultations from five frontier LLMs showed that learner skill level, rather than model choice, drove performance variation (2 = 0.31 vs 0.06), indicating that pedagogical quality emerges from architec-tural design rather than model scaling. In Phase 1b, 155 live student consultations revealed systematic failures in eliciting safety-critical information, generating automated curriculum diagnostics without expert observation. In a three-arm pilot randomized controlled trial (Phase 2, n = 58), AI-SP training achieved skill gains non-inferior to human SP practice, with a distinctive self-efficacy benefit unique to the AI-SP arm. These findings suggest that architecture-driven AI-SPs offer a scalable, model-portable paradigm for clinical communication training.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bridging the Literacy Gap for Surgical Consents: An AI-Human Expert Collaborative Approach 93%
- A typology of physician input approaches to using AI chatbots for clinical decision-making: a mixed methods study 93%
- Evaluation of two easy-to-implement digital breathing interventions in the context of daily stress levels in a series of N-of-1 trials: results from the Anti-Stress Intervention Among Physicians (ASIP) Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
- Prohibiting Babel - A call for professional remote interpreting services in pre-operation anaesthesia information 93%
- Optimising supervised machine learning algorithms predicting cigarette cravings and lapses for a smoking cessation just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 92%
- Assessing ChatGPT’s Mastery of Bloom’s Taxonomy using psychosomatic medicine exam questions 92%
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 93%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 92%
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.