Back

Artificial-Intelligence-Enabled Early Malnutrition Risk Assessment Tools for Elderly Trauma Patients in Intensive Care Units

Wei, X.; Xao, X.; Hou, J.; Wang, Q.

2026-04-27 nutrition
10.64898/2026.04.26.26351765 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background & AimsAccurate assessment of clinical malnutrition using anthropometric and functional indicators could improve the care of elderly trauma patients in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to develop an AI-driven malnutrition assessment toolbox based on a minimal set of clinically feasible indicators. MethodsMultiple machine learning models, including logistic regression, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, decision trees, random forests, XGBoost, and neural-network-based ensemble models, were developed using different indicator configurations from a clinically collected patient dataset. Models were trained using baseline and longitudinal measurements to predict malnutrition risk. SHAP analysis was used to interpret the importance of selected indicators. ResultsBaseline (Day 1) data alone did not provide a reliable prediction, whereas longitudinal measurements substantially improved performance. Models based on a minimal indicator set, including bilateral mid-upper arm circumference, calf circumference, and key static variables, outperformed models using the full indicator set. Tree-based methods consistently outperformed linear and distance-based models, with the three-time-point XGBoost achieving the best individual performance. Neural-network-based ensemble models further improved predictive stability. The best overall performance was achieved by the ensemble model using the minimal indicator set from Day 1 and Day 3. SHAP analysis confirmed the importance of the selected indicators. ConclusionsThis AI-driven toolbox provides an efficient and clinically feasible approach for early malnutrition assessment in elderly trauma patients in the ICU. Its strong performance with a minimal indicator set supports its potential for integration into clinical workflows and future digital twin systems for intelligent nutritional management.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
53.4%
50% of probability mass above
2
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
7
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
9
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
11
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
13
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%
21
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%