Back

Artificial-Intelligence-Enabled Early Malnutrition Risk Assessment Tools for Elderly Trauma Patients in Intensive Care Units

Wei, X.; Xao, X.; Hou, J.; Wang, Q.

2026-04-27 nutrition
10.64898/2026.04.26.26351765 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background & Aims: Accurate assessment of clinical malnutrition using anthropometric and functional indicators could improve the care of elderly trauma patients in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to develop an AI-driven malnutrition assessment toolbox based on a minimal set of clinically feasible indicators. Methods: Multiple machine learning models, including logistic regression, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, decision trees, random forests, XGBoost, and neural-network-based ensemble models, were developed using different indicator configurations from a clinically collected patient dataset. Models were trained using baseline and longitudinal measurements to predict malnutrition risk. SHAP analysis was used to interpret the importance of selected indicators. Results: Baseline (Day 1) data alone did not provide a reliable prediction, whereas longitudinal measurements substantially improved performance. Models based on a minimal indicator set, including bilateral mid-upper arm circumference, calf circumference, and key static variables, outperformed models using the full indicator set. Tree-based methods consistently outperformed linear and distance-based models, with the three-time-point XGBoost achieving the best individual performance. Neural-network-based ensemble models further improved predictive stability. The best overall performance was achieved by the ensemble model using the minimal indicator set from Day 1 and Day 3. SHAP analysis confirmed the importance of the selected indicators. Conclusions: This AI-driven toolbox provides an efficient and clinically feasible approach for early malnutrition assessment in elderly trauma patients in the ICU. Its strong performance with a minimal indicator set supports its potential for integration into clinical workflows and future digital twin systems for intelligent nutritional management.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
52.9%
50% of probability mass above
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
3
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
7
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
11
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
12
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
13
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
15
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
19
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%