Back

Cognitive load modulates cortical excitability in the human prefrontal cortex

Hassan, U.; Forman, L.; Hartford, J. W.; Lee, H.; Parmigiani, S.; Chen, N.-F.; Ross, J. M.; Solomon, E. A.; Gogulski, J.; Kim, N.; Truong, J.; Cline, C. C.; Keller, C. J.

2026-04-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.25.720856 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The prefrontal cortex dynamically adjusts its excitability to meet changing cognitive demands, yet our understanding of how these rapid state changes unfold in real time remains limited. Existing evidence relies predominantly on correlational neuroimaging and invasive electrophysiology in clinical populations, neither of which affords causal measurement in healthy humans. Here, using concurrent single-pulse TMS-EEG during a parametric cognitive multi-source interference task (MSIT) in 27 healthy participants, we causally probed left prefrontal excitability across conditions spanning a range of cognitive interference levels. Prefrontal excitability scaled systematically with cognitive load, peaking at intermediate incongruency levels where trial-type uncertainty was greatest, and differentiating high-from low-conflict trials at the single-subject level. Critically, prefrontal excitability and midfrontal theta power showed parallel state dependency patterns, linking causal perturbation of prefrontal circuit responsiveness to an established oscillatory marker of cognitive control. The observed excitability modulation was selective to the left prefrontal cortex: stimulation of right dlPFC, pre-SMA, and vertex in a separate control cohort (N=5) produced no load-dependent effects. These results position prefrontal excitability as a real-time, regionally selective physiological readout of how the human prefrontal cortex adapts to cognitive demand. HighlightsO_LIWe evaluated the links between cognitive interference, prefrontal excitability, and intrinsic theta activity during a multi-source interference task C_LIO_LICognitive load, estimated based on behavioral performance, was greatest at at intermediate interference levels (33% congruent), where trial-type uncertainty was maximal C_LIO_LIPrefrontal excitability, measured via single-pulse TMS-evoked potentials, scaled with cognitive load C_LIO_LIEffects were observed at the single subject level and were specific to prefrontal stimulation C_LIO_LIPrefrontal excitability changes and midfrontal theta power showed parallel scaling with cognitive load, linking causal probing to established oscillatory markers C_LIO_LIThis noninvasive technique provides causal measurement of prefrontal engagement during cognitive processing C_LIO_LIThe methodology demonstrates potential for tracking brain state dynamics in both healthy cognition and neuropsychiatric disorders C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.