Cognitive load modulates cortical excitability in the human prefrontal cortex
Hassan, U.; Forman, L.; Hartford, J. W.; Lee, H.; Parmigiani, S.; Chen, N.-F.; Ross, J. M.; Solomon, E. A.; Gogulski, J.; Kim, N.; Truong, J.; Cline, C. C.; Keller, C. J.
Show abstract
The prefrontal cortex dynamically adjusts its excitability to meet changing cognitive demands, yet our understanding of how these rapid state changes unfold in real time remains limited. Existing evidence relies predominantly on correlational neuroimaging and invasive electrophysiology in clinical populations, neither of which affords causal measurement in healthy humans. Here, using concurrent single-pulse TMS-EEG during a parametric cognitive multi-source interference task (MSIT) in 27 healthy participants, we causally probed left prefrontal excitability across conditions spanning a range of cognitive interference levels. Prefrontal excitability scaled systematically with cognitive load, peaking at intermediate incongruency levels where trial-type uncertainty was greatest, and differentiating high-from low-conflict trials at the single-subject level. Critically, prefrontal excitability and midfrontal theta power showed parallel state dependency patterns, linking causal perturbation of prefrontal circuit responsiveness to an established oscillatory marker of cognitive control. The observed excitability modulation was selective to the left prefrontal cortex: stimulation of right dlPFC, pre-SMA, and vertex in a separate control cohort (N=5) produced no load-dependent effects. These results position prefrontal excitability as a real-time, regionally selective physiological readout of how the human prefrontal cortex adapts to cognitive demand. HighlightsO_LIWe evaluated the links between cognitive interference, prefrontal excitability, and intrinsic theta activity during a multi-source interference task C_LIO_LICognitive load, estimated based on behavioral performance, was greatest at at intermediate interference levels (33% congruent), where trial-type uncertainty was maximal C_LIO_LIPrefrontal excitability, measured via single-pulse TMS-evoked potentials, scaled with cognitive load C_LIO_LIEffects were observed at the single subject level and were specific to prefrontal stimulation C_LIO_LIPrefrontal excitability changes and midfrontal theta power showed parallel scaling with cognitive load, linking causal probing to established oscillatory markers C_LIO_LIThis noninvasive technique provides causal measurement of prefrontal engagement during cognitive processing C_LIO_LIThe methodology demonstrates potential for tracking brain state dynamics in both healthy cognition and neuropsychiatric disorders C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping Cognitive Brain Functions at Scale 97%
- The role of alpha oscillations in a premotor-cerebellar loop in modulation of motor learning: insights from transcranial alternating current stimulation 96%
- Temporally-precise disruption of prefrontal cortex informed by the timing of beta bursts impairs human action-stopping 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct and complementary mechanisms of oscillatory and aperiodic alpha activity in visuospatial attention 96%
- Extracting Reproducible Components from Electroencephalographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Group Task-Related Component Analysis 95%
- Oscillatory Multi-Timescale Mechanisms Underlying Audiovisual Sequence Prediction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Parietal alpha stimulation causally enhances attentional information coding in evoked and oscillatory activity 96%
- Personalized alpha-tACS targeting left posterior parietal cortex modulates visuo-spatial attention and posterior evoked EEG activity 95%
- Personalized whole-brain activity patterns predict human corticospinal tract activation in real-time 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.