Back

More Efficient Walking via Temporal and Spatial Energy Transfer in a Passive Biarticular Exosuit

Firouzi, V.; Ahmadi, A.; Davoodi, A.; Haufe, D.; Seyfarth, A.; Sawicki, G. S.; Sharbafi, M. A.

2026-04-29 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.25.720622 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Evaluating bioinspired design principles in wearable assistive devices provides a unique opportunity to interrogate our understanding of the critical factors that enable agile, stable, and economical human movement. We introduce the BiArticular Thigh EXosuit (BATEX), a wearable device integrating two morphological features found in biological legged systems: biarticular muscles and elastic tissues. BATEX employs two biarticular springs spanning the hip and knee to emulate the human rectus femoris and hamstring muscles, creating beneficial synergy to enhance walking economy. This design enables two energy-shuffling mechanisms: temporal (spring-like storage/return at a joint) and spatial (strut-like transfer across joints). In walking experiments at 1.3 m/s with N = 9 participants, a single compliant biarticular spring yielded a 7% metabolic cost reduction compared to walking without BATEX. Individually optimized configurations further improved metabolic reduction to 9%. BATEX morphology allowed users not only to off-load biological joint power (Assist) but also to increase total power (Augment). Across all exosuit configurations, the mechanical impact of the exosuit was reflected by a significant correlation between changes in users biarticular muscles activity and changes in net metabolic rate. In sum, compliant-biarticular exosuit architectures can concurrently assist and augment human lower-limb joint function, providing significant metabolic savings during walking.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.5%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
5
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
8
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.1%
10
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.6%
12
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
17
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
21
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%