Back

How to be dispensable: genomic and transcriptomic determinants in maize genes

Joets, J.; Mollion, M.; Baudry, K.; Fagny, M.; Turc, O.; Cabrera-Bosquet, L.; Coursol, S.; Welcker, C.; Rogowsky, P.; Belcram, H.; Rousselet, A.; Venon, A.; Chaignon, S.; Pateyron, S.; Laplaige, J.; Paysant Le Roux, C.; Brunaud, V.; Martin, M.-L.; Palaffre, C.; Marande, W.; Tenaillon, M. I.; Vitte, C.

2026-04-29 plant biology
10.64898/2026.04.25.720561 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPlant genomes harbour a substantial proportion of dispensable genes - present only in a subset of individuals - that differ from ubiquitously shared core genes in multiple genomic and expression features. While these differences have been repeatedly documented, the factors shaping gene dispensability remain poorly understood. ResultsWe assembled a pan-gene set from eight maize inbred lines from American and European germplasms, together with their transcriptomic profile across 22 tissues/conditions, revealing the genomic and transcriptomic determinants of maize gene dispensability. Multivariate analysis demonstrates that gene expression level and purifying selection - rather than gene size - are the primary factors distinguishing core from dispensable genes. Dispensable genes overlap Helitrons at 4.6 times the rate of core genes, implicating Helitron-mediated gene capture as a major mechanism of dispensable gene formation. Classifying genes into stably expressed, variably expressed, and on-off categories shows that all three classes contain dispensable genes, though in different proportions than for core genes. Contrary to previous assumptions, we show that dispensable genes can participate in basal biological functions just as core genes, and that gene duplication likely provides only a partial mechanism for functional complementation of accessory genes absence. ConclusionsOur results provide novel insights into the molecular and evolutionary factors distinguishing core from dispensable genes and into the biological mechanisms shaping gene dispensability in maize, and demonstrate that classifying genes by transcriptional patterns provides a powerful framework for understanding the biological functions and evolutionary dynamics of both core and dispensable genes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.6%
2
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.8%
3
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.8%
4
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
5
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.1%
6
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.1%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 6%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
9
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
10
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.4%
12
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
13
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
14
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
16
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.4%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
19
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
22
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
24
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%