Back

Evaluation of potential serum analytes for individuals at-risk of multiple sclerosis

Mounts, K.; Liu, Y.; Fujita, M.; Oyegunle, J.; Neziraj, T.; Pollak, S. V.; Nandakumar, R.; Ngouth, N.; Steele, S. U.; Cortese, I.; White, C. C.; Jacobson, S.; Reich, D. S.; De Jager, P.

2026-04-29 immunology
10.64898/2026.04.25.715317 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Circulating proteins have been widely investigated as potential biomarkers in multiple sclerosis (MS), yet findings across studies are often inconsistent, likely reflecting differences in disease stage, treatment exposure, and cohort composition. Studying individuals at elevated risk of MS prior to disease onset offers a unique opportunity to identify immune alterations that precede clinical disease while minimizing confounders. Here, we investigated whether alterations in six previously MS-associated biomarkers are detectable and associate to underlying genetic susceptibility in two independent sample collections comprising people with MS (pwMS), healthy controls, and asymptomatic first-degree relatives of pwMS from the Genes & Environment in MS (GEMS) study cohort. The panel, representing complementary axes of MS immunopathology, included granzyme A (GZMA), MER tyrosine kinase (MERTK), interleukin-2 receptor alpha (IL2RA), osteopontin (SPP1), CD30 (TNFRSF8), and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1). None of the proteins demonstrated associations with MS. A composite score constructed from externally derived effect estimates was not associated with MS status in either collection or in meta-analysis. Among asymptomatic first-degree relatives, the composite score was not significantly associated with group status. In contrast, an inverse correlation between SPP1 and the MS genetic risk score among GEMS participants was found ({beta} = -0.246, p = 0.001). Together, these findings suggest that several circulating proteins recently proposed as MS biomarkers are not robust tools to distinguish MS from healthy individuals. However, SPP1 levels are highlighted for further evaluation among at-risk individuals, and further work is needed to determine whether circulating immune signatures can capture the earliest stages of MS in at-risk individuals.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.6%
2
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.2%
3
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
5
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Arthritis & Rheumatology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
7
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
13
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Journal of Neuroinflammation
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
ImmunoHorizons
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
European Journal of Immunology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
26
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
29
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
30
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%