Development of Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Early Detection and Risk Stratification of Diabetes in Age Specific Variations
Lukhele, N.; Mostafa, F.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo develop and evaluate a novel machine learning (ML) framework tailored to a clinical diabetes dataset and to assess whether demographic stratification enhances model performance and interpretability for multiclass diabetes classification. MethodsA clinical dataset of 264 patients records was used to classify individuals into non-diabetic, prediabetic and diabetic categories. Several supervised learning models were trained using 80:20 train-test split and optimized using RandomizedSearchCV Model and 10-fold cross validation. Model performance was evaluated using the metrics accuracy, precision, recall and the F1-score. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated for the best generalizing model. A structured ML framework was developed for this dataset, incorporating preprocessing, model optimization, age stratification analysis age (<35 vs [≥]35 years) and gender. SHAP was developed for model interpretability. ResultsEnsemble methods demonstrated superior performance in comparison to linear or single-tree approaches, with Gradient Boosting showing the most stable generalization with a test accuracy of 0.981 and stable cross validation accuracy of 0.972. AUC-ROC analysis using Gradient Boosting yielded good discriminative ability across the three diabetes classes: 0.991 (non-diabetic), 0.986 (prediabetic) and 0.972 (diabetic). Stratified analysis showed improved reliability in individuals aged [≥]35 years (accuracy = 0.94, F1-score = 0.92), while performance in younger individuals was unstable due to small sample size. SHAP analysis identified HbA1c, BMI, and age as dominant predictors. ConclusionThis study presents a ML framework integrating age stratified modelling with explainable ML frameworks to improve interpretability. The findings offer clinically relevant results that can support clinical decision-making systems, individualized risk assessment, and potential applications for targeted intervention in diabetes progression.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Probability from Imbalanced Medical Survey Data: An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with Explainable AI (XAI) Insights 94%
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 94%
- Improving irregular temporal modeling by integrating synthetic data to the electronic medical record using conditional GANs: a case study of fluid overload prediction in the intensive care unit 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial disparities in continuous glucose monitoring-based 60-min glucose predictions among people with type 1 diabetes 97%
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 94%
- Automated Image Transcription for Perinatal Blood Pressure Monitoring Using Mobile Health Technology 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical interpretation of machine learning models for prediction of diabetic complications using electronic health records 96%
- Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: A case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases 93%
- Trajectories: a framework for detecting temporal clinical event sequences from health data standardized to the OMOP Common Data Model 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting long-term Type 2 Diabetes with Support Vector Machine using Oral Glucose Tolerance Test 97%
- ChatGPT-Enhanced ROC Analysis (CERA): A Shiny Web Tool for Finding Optimal Cutoff in Biomarker Analysis 93%
- The Impact of Clinical Audits on Improving the Effectiveness of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) CARE in Primary Health Centers. A Comprehensive Pre-post analysis through Multi-layered Intervention: The ICAE-DM CARE study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 94%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 93%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.