Back

Bayesian joint modelling of antibody kinetics and test-negative vaccine effectiveness to characterise hybrid immunity across epidemic waves

Benammar, A.

2026-04-27 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.04.25.26351732 medRxiv
Show abstract

Vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection has shown marked temporal variation across epidemic waves, driven by a combination of waning immunity and immune escape by emerging variants. Test-negative case-control designs have been central to VE monitoring, but they operate at a population level and provide limited insight into the underlying immune mechanisms. In parallel, longitudinal serological studies have characterised antibody trajectories after vaccination and infection, and quantitative models have linked neutralising antibody levels to protection against infection and severe disease. These two streams of evidence are usually analysed separately. We propose a Bayesian joint model that links individual-level antibody kinetics to test-negative VE estimates across successive epidemic waves. The model represents hybrid immunity as the combined effect of vaccination and documented or undocumented infection, with antibody titres following a boost-and-decay process after each immunising event. A titre-protection curve maps latent antibody levels to the risk of symptomatic infection with each variant, extending the correlates-of-protection framework. This allows us to decompose observed VE into contributions from waning, immune escape, and differences in exposure. Using simulated data calibrated on realistic vaccination schedules, infection histories and assay performance, we show that the joint model can recover the underlying titre-protection relationship and separate variant-specific immune escape from pure waning. In scenarios with hybrid immunity, the model captures higher and more durable titres, consistent with empirical observations. When applied to test-negative surveillance data enriched with nested serology, the approach yields VE trajectories that are more interpretable and more stable across time than conventional analyses. This framework provides a coherent way to combine serology and VE to quantify hybrid immunity, and offers practical summary measures for comparing vaccine strategies in the presence of evolving variants.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 3%
22.2%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.0%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.3%
4
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
5
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
7
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
8
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
16
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
18
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
20
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
24
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%